Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Apr;44(4):473-86.
doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0136-8.

Interventions to prevent sports related injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Interventions to prevent sports related injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Mari Leppänen et al. Sports Med. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The effects of methods to prevent injuries have been studied in several systematic reviews. However, no meta-analysis taking into account all randomised controlled intervention trials aiming at the prevention of sports injuries has been published.

Objective: To summarise the effects of sports injury prevention interventions.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Data sources: PubMed, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, PEDro, and Web of Science, searched in September 2013. The reference lists of retrieved articles and reviews were hand searched.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: To be selected articles had to examine the effects of any preventive intervention on sports injuries, be randomised/quasi-randomised and controlled trials, published in a peer-reviewed journal. The outcome of the trial had to be injury rate or the number of injured individuals.

Results: Of the 5580 articles retrieved after a search of databases and the relevant bibliography, 68 randomised controlled trials were included in the systematic review and 60 trials were included in the meta-analysis. Insoles (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.81), external joint supports (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.30-0.53), and specific training programmes (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.46-0.66) appeared to be effective in reducing the risk of sports injuries. Stretching (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80-1.06), modified shoes (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.81-1.87), and preventive videos (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.44-1.68) seemed not to be effective.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that certain interventions can reduce the risk of sports injuries. There were limitations regarding the quality of the trials, generalisability of the results, and heterogeneity of the study designs. In future, the mechanisms behind effective methods and the most beneficial elements of preventive training programmes need to be clarified.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Aug 13-27;167(15):1585-92 - PubMed
    1. Foot Ankle Int. 2004 Jul;25(7):462-6 - PubMed
    1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD000450 - PubMed
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Sep;39(9):1840-8 - PubMed
    1. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1985 Dec;75(12):644-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources