Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb 2:8590:10.1117/12.2003187.
doi: 10.1117/12.2003187.

Single-molecule FRET experiments with a red-enhanced custom technology SPAD

Affiliations

Single-molecule FRET experiments with a red-enhanced custom technology SPAD

Francesco Panzeri et al. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. .

Abstract

Single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy of freely diffusing molecules in solution is a powerful tool used to investigate the properties of individual molecules. Single-Photon Avalanche Diodes (SPADs) are the detectors of choice for these applications. Recently a new type of SPAD detector was introduced, dubbed red-enhanced SPAD (RE-SPAD), with good sensitivity throughout the visible spectrum and with excellent timing performance. We report a characterization of this new detector for single-molecule fluorescence resonant energy transfer (smFRET) studies on freely diffusing molecules in a confocal geometry and alternating laser excitation (ALEX) scheme. We use a series of doubly-labeled DNA molecules with donor-to-acceptor distances covering the whole range of useful FRET values. Both intensity-based (μs-ALEX) and lifetime-based (ns-ALEX) measurements are presented and compared to identical measurements performed with standard thick SPADs. Our results demonstrate the great potential of this new detector for smFRET measurements and beyond.

Keywords: ALEX; FRET; SPAD; TCSPC; confocal; diffusion; lifetime; single-molecule.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
DNA sequence used in this work, with location of the dyes indicated for each sample (A: acceptor, D: donor).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Setup schematics showing the excitation paths (top right) and the emission path (bottom left) as well as the data acquisition system (bottom right). A detailed description of the setup can be found in the main text. Abbreviations: M = mirror; DM = dichroic mirror; FM = flippable mirror; BP = band-pass filter; L = lens; BE = beam expander; AOM = acousto-optic modulator; PDM = standard custom-technology SPAD; RE-SPAD = red-enhanced custom-technology SPAD; SPCM = Perkin-Elmer SPAD.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of the FRET histograms obtained with the two different sets of detectors (Polimi: filled gray histogram and Perkin-Elmer: black outline) for all 5 samples (d = 7–27 bp). Both sets of detectors provide identical results, although the Polimi detectors collect slightly less bursts than the Perkin-Elmer ones during the same amount of time, due to their slightly lower PDE.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Nanotime histograms of the FRET population for the 5 samples (d = 7, 12, 17, 22 and 27 from left to right) as collected with the Polimi detectors (top row) and Perkin-Elmer detectors (bottom row). A single laser period of 14.8 ns is shown (first time axis tick: 0 ns, last tick: 16 ns). The black curves (in units of counts per TAC bin) are the calibrated decays, shown with the corresponding multi-exponential fits in red. The IRF is shown in light gray (arbitrary units). The fitted lifetimes are reported in Table 2.
Figure 5
Figure 5
FRET efficiencies measured in this work using different techniques and detectors. The two sets of μs-ALEX measurements performed with different detectors (black squares: Polimi detectors, open circles: Perkin-Elmer detectors) are in excellent agreement with one another and in reasonable agreement with the values obtained using ns-ALEX (black triangles: Polimi detectors, open triangles: Perkin-Elmer detectors), except for the 17 bp sample, where ns-ALEX FRET efficiencies exhibit a significant dispersion. The plain and dashed curves correspond to the prediction of a simple geometric model for the dsDNA molecule and its attached dyes, discussed in the text, for different parameter values r and R0 (values in nm).

References

    1. Vacha M, Habuchi S. Conformation and physics of polymer chains: a single-molecule perspective. NPG Asia Mater. 2010;2(4):134–142.
    1. Michalet X, Weiss S, Jäger M. Single-molecule fluorescence studies of protein folding and conformational dynamics. Chem Rev. 2006;106(5):1785–1813. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Min W, English BP, Luo GB, Cherayil BJ, Kou SC, Xie XS. Fluctuating enzymes: Lessons from single-molecule studies. Accounts Chem Res. 2005;38(12):923–931. - PubMed
    1. DeRocco VC, Anderson T, Piehler J, Erie DA, Weninger K. Four-color single-molecule fluorescence with noncovalent dye labeling to monitor dynamic multimolecular complexes. Biotechniques. 2010;49(5):807–816. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heilemann M, Kasper R, Tinnefeld P, Sauer M. Dissecting and Reducing the Heterogeneity of Excited-State Energy Transport in DNA-Based Photonic Wires. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128(51):16864–16875. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources