Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jan:1308:68-88.
doi: 10.1111/nyas.12319. Epub 2013 Dec 26.

Measures and indicators for assessing impact of interventions integrating nutrition, health, and early childhood development

Affiliations
Review

Measures and indicators for assessing impact of interventions integrating nutrition, health, and early childhood development

Edward A Frongillo et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

When implementing interventions integrating nutrition, health, and early childhood development, evaluation studies of effectiveness that assess the intermediate and ultimate impacts on the four domains of food and nutrition, family care, health, and child development are needed. Such studies should demonstrate impact, both benefits and potential harms, and understand mechanisms through which impact has been achieved. This article reviews and suggests measures and indicators suitable for use in evaluation studies of effectiveness of integrated interventions for children under 5 years of age. Within each of the four domains, multiple constructs and subconstructs were considered. For each construct and subconstruct, we identified measures and indicators, using several search processes, and reviewed them in relation to validity, responsiveness to intervention inputs and activities, equivalence in constructs and items across contexts with appropriate adaptation, and feasibility for use in effectiveness studies. Suggested measures and indicators for each domain, construct, and subconstruct are tabulated and described. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of measures and indicators across domains and constructs, further research establishing validity, and guidance on adaptation of measures to particular contexts.

Keywords: child development; early childhood; family care; health; integrated interventions; nutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Engle, P.L. et al. 2007. Strategies to avoid the loss of developmental potential in more than 200 million children in the developing world. Lancet 369: 229-242.
    1. Frongillo, E.A. 1999. Validation of measures of food insecurity and hunger. J. Nutr. 129: 506S-509S.
    1. Frongillo, E., S. Nanama & W. Wolfe. 2004. Technical Guide to Developing a Direct, Experience-Based Measurement Tool for Household Food Insecurity, pp. 1-51. Washington, DC: Food and Nutritional Technical Assistance, Academy for Educational Development.
    1. Byrne, B.M. & D. Watkins. 2003. The issue of measurement invariance revisited. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 34: 155-175.
    1. Van de Vliver, F. 2003. “Bias and equivalence: cross-cultural perspectives.” In Cross-Cultural Survey Methods. J. Harkness, F. Van de Vliver & P. Mohler, Eds.: 143-155. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.