Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Dec 30:13:246.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-246.

Estimating the prevalence of obstetric fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Estimating the prevalence of obstetric fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A J Adler et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Obstetric fistula is a severe condition which has devastating consequences for a woman's life. The estimation of the burden of fistula at the population level has been impaired by the rarity of diagnosis and the lack of rigorous studies. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence and incidence of fistula in low and middle income countries.

Methods: Six databases were searched, involving two separate searches: one on fistula specifically and one on broader maternal and reproductive morbidities. Studies including estimates of incidence and prevalence of fistula at the population level were included. We conducted meta-analyses of prevalence of fistula among women of reproductive age and the incidence of fistula among recently pregnant women.

Results: Nineteen studies were included in this review. The pooled prevalence in population-based studies was 0.29 (95% CI 0.00, 1.07) fistula per 1000 women of reproductive age in all regions. Separated by region we found 1.57 (95% CI 1.16, 2.06) in sub Saharan Africa and South Asia, 1.60 (95% CI 1.16, 2.10) per 1000 women of reproductive age in sub Saharan Africa and 1.20 (95% CI 0.10, 3.54) per 1000 in South Asia. The pooled incidence was 0.09 (95% CI 0.01, 0.25) per 1000 recently pregnant women.

Conclusions: Our study is the most comprehensive study of the burden of fistula to date. Our findings suggest that the prevalence of fistula is lower than previously reported. The low burden of fistula should not detract from their public health importance, however, given the preventability of the condition, and the devastating consequences of fistula.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Types of studies included in our analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PRISMA diagram of studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prevalence of fistula per 1000 women of reproductive age.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Prevalence of fistula per 1000 women of reproductive age stratified by region.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Prevalence of fistula per 1000 women of reproductive age in studies with hospital-based recruitment.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Incidence of fistula per 1000 pregnancies in community-based studies, stratified by region.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Incidence of fistula per 1000 pregnant women in studies with hospital-based recruitment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO. Obstetric fistula: guiding principles for clinical management and programme development. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. - PubMed
    1. Wall LL, Arrowsmith SD, Briggs ND, Browning A, Lassey A. The obstetric vesicovaginal fistula in the developing world. Obste & gyne survey. 2005;13(7 Suppl 1):S3–S51. - PubMed
    1. Danso KA, Martey JO, Wall LL, Elkins TE. The epidemiology of genitourinary fistulae in Kumasi, Ghana, 1977-1992. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;13(3):117–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01894198. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Langkilde NC, Pless TK, Lundbeck F, Nerstrom B. Surgical repair of vesicovaginal fistulae–a ten-year retrospective study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1999;13(2):100–103. doi: 10.1080/003655999750016069. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karateke A, Cam C, Ozdemir A, Guney B, Vatansever D, Celik C. Characteristics of obstetric fistulas and the need for a prognostic classification system. Archives of Med Sci. 2010;13(2):253–256. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms