Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;60(5):940-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.12.019. Epub 2013 Dec 25.

Altered profile of human gut microbiome is associated with cirrhosis and its complications

Affiliations

Altered profile of human gut microbiome is associated with cirrhosis and its complications

Jasmohan S Bajaj et al. J Hepatol. 2014 May.

Abstract

Background & aims: The gut microbiome is altered in cirrhosis; however its evolution with disease progression is only partly understood. We aimed to study changes in the microbiome over cirrhosis severity, its stability over time and its longitudinal alterations with decompensation.

Methods: Controls and age-matched cirrhotics (compensated/decompensated/hospitalized) were included. Their stool microbiota was quantified using multi-tagged pyrosequencing. The ratio of autochthonous to non-autochthonous taxa was calculated as the cirrhosis dysbiosis ratio (CDR); a low number indicating dysbiosis. Firstly, the microbiome was compared between controls and cirrhotic sub-groups. Secondly, for stability assessment, stool collected twice within 6months in compensated outpatients was analyzed. Thirdly, changes after decompensation were assessed using (a) longitudinal comparison in patients before/after hepatic encephalopathy development (HE), (b) longitudinal cohort of hospitalized infected cirrhotics MELD-matched to uninfected cirrhotics followed for 30days.

Results: 244 subjects [219 cirrhotics (121 compensated outpatients, 54 decompensated outpatients, 44 inpatients) and 25 age-matched controls] were included. CDR was highest in controls (2.05) followed by compensated (0.89), decompensated (0.66), and inpatients (0.32, p<0.0001) and negatively correlated with endotoxin. Microbiota and CDR remained unchanged in stable outpatient cirrhotics (0.91 vs. 0.86, p=0.45). In patients studied before/after HE development, dysbiosis occurred post-HE (CDR: 1.2 to 0.42, p=0.03). In the longitudinal matched-cohort, microbiota were significantly different between infected/uninfected cirrhotics at baseline and a low CDR was associated with death and organ failures within 30days.

Conclusions: Progressive changes in the gut microbiome accompany cirrhosis and become more severe in the setting of decompensation. The cirrhosis dysbiosis ratio may be a useful quantitative index to describe microbiome alterations accompanying cirrhosis progression.

Keywords: Acute-on-chronic liver failure; Cirrhosis dysbiosis ratio; Decompensation; Endotoxin; Hepatic encephalopathy; Infections; MELD score; Microbiota.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None for any author

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. PCO analysis of microbiota between groups
Fig. 1(A): Controls were clustered together (blue) compared to all cirrhotics (red) Fig. 1(B): Controls (blue) were clustered with outpatient cirrhotics (green) and far from inpatient cirrhotics (red) Each dot represents a subject in the graphs and the distance between the dots is proportional to the similarity in microbial abundance pattern. Therefore dots that are clustered together have similar microbial composition than those that are relatively further apart.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. PCO analysis of microbiota in the cohort study
Controls (red) were clustered with cirrhotics without infections (pink) but farther away from MELD-matched cirrhotics with infections (blue)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. PCO analysis of microbiota in patients with poor outcomes within 30 days
Fig. 3(A): Organ failure: Clustering of controls (red) with cirrhotics without (blue) and away from those with organ failure (green) Fig. 3(B): Death: Clustering of controls (blue) with cirrhotics without outcomes (red) and away from those who died (green)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Merli M, Lucidi C, Giannelli V, Giusto M, Riggio O, Falcone M, et al. Cirrhotic patients are at risk for health care-associated bacterial infections. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:979–985. - PubMed
    1. Quigley EM, Stanton C, Murphy EF. The gut microbiota and the liver. Pathophysiological and clinical implications. J Hepatol. 2013;58:1020–1027. - PubMed
    1. Wiest R, Krag A, Gerbes A. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: recent guidelines and beyond. Gut. 2012;61:297–310. - PubMed
    1. Arvaniti V, D'Amico G, Fede G, Manousou P, Tsochatzis E, Pleguezuelo M, et al. Infections in patients with cirrhosis increase mortality four-fold and should be used in determining prognosis. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1246–1256. 1256 e1241-1245. - PubMed
    1. Bajaj JS, O'Leary JG, Reddy KR, Wong F, Olson JC, Subramanian RM, et al. Second infections independently increase mortality in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis: the North American consortium for the study of end-stage liver disease (NACSELD) experience. Hepatology. 2012;56:2328–2335. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms