Rod visual pigment optimizes active state to achieve efficient G protein activation as compared with cone visual pigments
- PMID: 24375403
- PMCID: PMC3931065
- DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.508507
Rod visual pigment optimizes active state to achieve efficient G protein activation as compared with cone visual pigments
Abstract
Most vertebrate retinas contain two types of photoreceptor cells, rods and cones, which show different photoresponses to mediate scotopic and photopic vision, respectively. These cells contain different types of visual pigments, rhodopsin and cone visual pigments, respectively, but little is known about the molecular properties of cone visual pigments under physiological conditions, making it difficult to link the molecular properties of rhodopsin and cone visual pigments with the differences in photoresponse between rods and cones. Here we prepared bovine and mouse rhodopsin (bvRh and mRh) and chicken and mouse green-sensitive cone visual pigments (cG and mG) embedded in nanodiscs and applied time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy to compare their Gt activation efficiencies. Rhodopsin exhibited greater Gt activation efficiencies than cone visual pigments. Especially, the Gt activation efficiency of mRh was about 2.5-fold greater than that of mG at 37 °C, which is consistent with our previous electrophysiological data of knock-in mice. Although the active state (Meta-II) was in equilibrium with inactive states (Meta-I and Meta-III), quantitative determination of Meta-II in the equilibrium showed that the Gt activation efficiency per Meta-II of bvRh was also greater than those of cG and mG. These results indicated that efficient Gt activation by rhodopsin, resulting from an optimized active state of rhodopsin, is one of the causes of the high amplification efficiency of rods.
Keywords: Fluorescence Spectroscopy; G Protein Activation Efficiency; G Protein-coupled Receptors (GPCR); Membrane Bilayer; Membrane Proteins; Rhodopsin; UV Spectroscopy.
Figures









Similar articles
-
Efficiencies of activation of transducin by cone and rod visual pigments.Biochemistry. 2013 Apr 30;52(17):3010-8. doi: 10.1021/bi3015967. Epub 2013 Apr 19. Biochemistry. 2013. PMID: 23570417
-
Physiological properties of rod photoreceptor cells in green-sensitive cone pigment knock-in mice.J Gen Physiol. 2007 Jul;130(1):21-40. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200609729. J Gen Physiol. 2007. PMID: 17591985 Free PMC article.
-
Phosphorylation-independent suppression of light-activated visual pigment by arrestin in carp rods and cones.J Biol Chem. 2015 Apr 10;290(15):9399-411. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.634543. Epub 2015 Feb 20. J Biol Chem. 2015. PMID: 25713141 Free PMC article.
-
Iodopsin, a red-sensitive cone visual pigment in the chicken retina.Photochem Photobiol. 1991 Dec;54(6):1061-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1991.tb02130.x. Photochem Photobiol. 1991. PMID: 1775529 Review.
-
Cone visual pigments.Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 May;1837(5):664-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Sep 7. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014. PMID: 24021171 Review.
Cited by
-
Functional trade-offs and environmental variation shaped ancient trajectories in the evolution of dim-light vision.Elife. 2018 Oct 26;7:e35957. doi: 10.7554/eLife.35957. Elife. 2018. PMID: 30362942 Free PMC article.
-
Lipid-Protein Interplay in Dimerization of Juxtamembrane Domains of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor.Biophys J. 2018 Feb 27;114(4):893-903. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.029. Biophys J. 2018. PMID: 29490249 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitation of the neural silencing activity of anion channelrhodopsins in Caenorhabditis elegans and their applicability for long-term illumination.Sci Rep. 2019 May 27;9(1):7863. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44308-x. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31133660 Free PMC article.
-
Adaptation of Antarctic Icefish Vision to Extreme Environments.Mol Biol Evol. 2023 Apr 4;40(4):msad030. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msad030. Mol Biol Evol. 2023. PMID: 36763103 Free PMC article.
-
Glu1022.53-Mediated Early Conformational Changes in the Process of Light-Induced Green Cone Pigment Activation.Biochemistry. 2024 Apr 2;63(7):843-854. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.3c00594. Epub 2024 Mar 8. Biochemistry. 2024. PMID: 38458614 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kawamura S., Tachibanaki S. (2008) Rod and cone photoreceptors: molecular basis of the difference in their physiology. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 150, 369–377 - PubMed
-
- Yau K. W. (1994) Phototransduction mechanism in retinal rods and cones. The Friedenwald Lecture. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 35, 9–32 - PubMed
-
- Ebrey T., Koutalos Y. (2001) Vertebrate photoreceptors. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 20, 49–94 - PubMed
-
- Arshavsky V. Y., Lamb T. D., Pugh E. N., Jr. (2002) G proteins and phototransduction. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 64, 153–187 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous