Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;59(5):1954-63.
doi: 10.1002/hep.26977. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

Serum immunoglobulin G4 and immunoglobulin G1 for distinguishing immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis from primary sclerosing cholangitis

Affiliations

Serum immunoglobulin G4 and immunoglobulin G1 for distinguishing immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis from primary sclerosing cholangitis

Kirsten Boonstra et al. Hepatology. 2014 May.

Abstract

The recent addition of immunoglobulin (Ig)G4-associated cholangitis (IAC), also called IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IRSC), to the spectrum of chronic cholangiopathies has created the clinical need for reliable methods to discriminate between IAC and the more common cholestatic entities, primary (PSC) and secondary sclerosing cholangitis. The current American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases practice guidelines for PSC advise on the measurement of specific Ig (sIg)G4 in PSC patients, but interpretation of elevated sIgG4 levels remains unclear. We aimed to provide an algorithm to distinguish IAC from PSC using sIgG analyses. We measured total IgG and IgG subclasses in serum samples of IAC (n = 73) and PSC (n = 310) patients, as well as in serum samples of disease controls (primary biliary cirrhosis; n = 22). sIgG4 levels were elevated above the upper limit of normal (ULN = >1.4 g/L) in 45 PSC patients (15%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11-19). The highest specificity and positive predictive value (PPV; 100%) for IAC were reached when applying the 4 × ULN (sIgG4 > 5.6 g/L) cutoff with a sensitivity of 42% (95% CI: 31-55). However, in patients with a sIgG4 between 1 × and 2 × ULN (n = 38/45), the PPV of sIgG4 for IAC was only 28%. In this subgroup, the sIgG4/sIgG1 ratio cutoff of 0.24 yielded a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI: 51-95), a specificity of 74% (95% CI: 57-86), a PPV of 55% (95% CI: 33-75), and a negative predictive value of 90% (95% CI: 73-97).

Conclusion: Elevated sIgG4 (>1.4 g/L) occurred in 15% of patients with PSC. In patients with a sIgG4 >1.4 and <2.8 g/L, incorporating the IgG4/IgG1 ratio with a cutoff at 0.24 in the diagnostic algorithm significantly improved PPV and specificity. We propose a new diagnostic algorithm based on IgG4/IgG1 ratio that may be used in clinical practice to distinguish PSC from IAC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
HISORt diagnostic criteria (histology, imaging, serology, other organ involvement, and response to therapy) for IgG4-associated cholangitis (IAC). Adapted from Ghazale et al.,7 Alderlieste et al.,15 and Maillette de Buy Wenniger et al.16
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scatterplot of sIgG4 in PSC, IAC, and PBC patients. Lower limit of normal (LLN)−1×, 1×-2×, 2×-4x, and >4x ULN are marked with different shades of gray. The bar across each column represents the median value. Statistic bars represent PSC versus PBC, PSC versus IAC, and IAC versus PBC comparisons by Mann-Whitney's U test.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ROC curves of sIgG4 for diagnosis of IAC versus PSC patients in the test (A) and validation cohorts (B). Arrows are pointing toward the ULN of sIgG4 (1.4 g/L) and the optimal cut-off value (2.5 g/L).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Scatterplot of sIgG4/sIgG1 in PSC and IAC patients with a sIgG4 between 1.4 and 2.8 g/L. The ratio cut-off value of 0.24 is shown as a dotted line. The bar across each column represents the median value.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Proposed algorithm for distinguishing IAC from PSC using sIgG4 and sIgG4/sIgG1 ratio analysis.

References

    1. Boonstra K, Beuers U, Ponsioen CY. Epidemiology of primary sclerosing cholangitis and primary biliary cirrhosis: a systematic review. J Hepatol. 2012;56:1181–1188. - PubMed
    1. Krones E, Graziadei I, Trauner M, Fickert P. Evolving concepts in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Liver Int. 2012;32:352–369. - PubMed
    1. Boonstra K, Weersma R, van Erpecum KJ, Rauws EA, Spanier BW, Poen AC, et al. Population-based epidemiology, malignancy risk and outcome of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2013;58:2045–2055. - PubMed
    1. Claessen MM, Vleggaar FP, Tytgat KM, Siersema PD, van Buuren HR. High lifetime risk of cancer in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2009;50:158–164. - PubMed
    1. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of cholestatic liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2009;51:237–267. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources