Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb 1;71(1):10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.003.
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.003.

Newness, Givenness and Discourse Updating: Evidence from Eye Movements

Affiliations

Newness, Givenness and Discourse Updating: Evidence from Eye Movements

Ashley Benatar et al. J Mem Lang. .

Abstract

Three experiments examined the effect of contextual givenness on eye movements in reading, following Schwarzschild's (1999) analysis of givenness and focus-marking in which relations among entities as well as the entities themselves can be given. In each study, a context question was followed by an answer in which a critical word was either given, new, or contrastively (correctively) focused. Target words were read faster when the critical word provided given information than when it provided new information, and faster when it provided new information than when it corrected prior information. Repetition of target words was controlled in two ways: by mentioning a non-given target word in the context in a relation other than that in which it occurred as a target, and by using a synonym or subordinate of a given target to refer to it in the context question. Verbatim repetition was not responsible for the observed effects of givenness and contrastiveness. Besides clarifying previous inconsistent results of the effects of focus and givenness on reading speed, these results indicate that reading speed can be influenced essentially immediately by a reader's discourse representation, and that the extent of the influence is graded, with corrections to a representation having a larger effect than simple additions.

Keywords: discourse representation; discourse updating; focus; givenness; information status; reading.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arnold JE. How speakers refer: The role of accessibility. Language and Linguistics Compass. 2010;4:187–203.
    1. Baayen RH. Analyzing linguistic data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
    1. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language. 2008;59(4):390–413. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005. - DOI
    1. Balota DA, Yap MJ, Cortese MJ, Hutchison KA, Kessler B, Loftis B, Neely JH, Nelson DL, Simpson GB, Treiman R. The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods. 2007;39(3):445–459. - PubMed
    1. Barr DJ, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily HJ. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language. 2013;68(3):255–278. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources