Newness, Givenness and Discourse Updating: Evidence from Eye Movements
- PMID: 24376304
- PMCID: PMC3873159
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.003
Newness, Givenness and Discourse Updating: Evidence from Eye Movements
Abstract
Three experiments examined the effect of contextual givenness on eye movements in reading, following Schwarzschild's (1999) analysis of givenness and focus-marking in which relations among entities as well as the entities themselves can be given. In each study, a context question was followed by an answer in which a critical word was either given, new, or contrastively (correctively) focused. Target words were read faster when the critical word provided given information than when it provided new information, and faster when it provided new information than when it corrected prior information. Repetition of target words was controlled in two ways: by mentioning a non-given target word in the context in a relation other than that in which it occurred as a target, and by using a synonym or subordinate of a given target to refer to it in the context question. Verbatim repetition was not responsible for the observed effects of givenness and contrastiveness. Besides clarifying previous inconsistent results of the effects of focus and givenness on reading speed, these results indicate that reading speed can be influenced essentially immediately by a reader's discourse representation, and that the extent of the influence is graded, with corrections to a representation having a larger effect than simple additions.
Keywords: discourse representation; discourse updating; focus; givenness; information status; reading.
Similar articles
-
Animacy matters: ERP evidence for the multi-dimensionality of topic-worthiness in Chinese.Brain Res. 2014 Mar 25;1555:36-47. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.01.046. Epub 2014 Feb 3. Brain Res. 2014. PMID: 24502981
-
Focus, newness and their combination: processing of information structure in discourse.PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042533. Epub 2012 Aug 17. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22912708 Free PMC article.
-
Linguistic Focus Promotes the Ease of Discourse Integration Processes in Reading Comprehension: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 1;9:2718. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02718. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30774620 Free PMC article.
-
Strength of discourse context as a determinant of the subordinate bias effect.Q J Exp Psychol A. 1999 Nov;52(4):813-39. doi: 10.1080/713755861. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1999. PMID: 10660407
-
So Much to Read, So Little Time: How Do We Read, and Can Speed Reading Help?Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2016 May;17(1):4-34. doi: 10.1177/1529100615623267. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2016. PMID: 26769745 Review.
Cited by
-
The manuscript that we finished: structural separation reduces the cost of complement coercion.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Mar;41(2):526-40. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000042. Epub 2014 Jul 7. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015. PMID: 24999707 Free PMC article.
-
Focus takes time: structural effects on reading.Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1733-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0843-2. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015. PMID: 25962686 Free PMC article.
-
The "exaptation" of linguistic implicit strategies.Springerplus. 2016 Jul 18;5(1):1106. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2788-y. eCollection 2016. Springerplus. 2016. PMID: 27478723 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction in the Processing of Repair Disfluencies.Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan;31(1):73-79. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1036089. Epub 2015 Apr 21. Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 26878026 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Sep;42(9):1400-16. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000256. Epub 2016 Feb 11. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016. PMID: 26866657 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arnold JE. How speakers refer: The role of accessibility. Language and Linguistics Compass. 2010;4:187–203.
-
- Baayen RH. Analyzing linguistic data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
-
- Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language. 2008;59(4):390–413. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005. - DOI
-
- Balota DA, Yap MJ, Cortese MJ, Hutchison KA, Kessler B, Loftis B, Neely JH, Nelson DL, Simpson GB, Treiman R. The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods. 2007;39(3):445–459. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources