Validity and reliability of using a self-lavaging device for cytology and HPV testing for cervical cancer screening: findings from a pilot study
- PMID: 24376516
- PMCID: PMC3869665
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082115
Validity and reliability of using a self-lavaging device for cytology and HPV testing for cervical cancer screening: findings from a pilot study
Abstract
Self-sampling could increase cervical cancer screening uptake. While methods have been identified for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, to date, self-sampling has not provided adequate specimens for cytology. We piloted the validity and reliability of using a self-lavaging device for cervical cytology and HPV testing. We enrolled 198 women in New York City in 2008-2009 from three ambulatory clinics where they received cervical cancer screening. All were asked to use the Delphi Screener™ to self-lavage 1-3 months after clinician-collected index cytological smear (100 normal; 98 abnormal). Women with abnormal cytology results from either specimen underwent colposcopy; 10 women with normal results from both specimens also underwent colposcopy. We calculated sensitivity of self-collected cytology to detect histologically confirmed high grade lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN, 2+); specificity for histology-negative (CIN 1 or lower), paired cytology negative, or a third cytology negative; and kappa for paired results. One hundred and ninety-seven (99.5%) women self-collected a lavage. Seventy-five percent had moderate to excellent cellularity, two specimens were unsatisfactory for cytology. Seven of 167 (4%) women with definitive results had CIN2+; one had normal and six abnormal cytology results with the self-lavage (sensitivity = 86%, 95% Confidence Interval, CI: 42, 100). The kappa for paired cytology was low (0.36; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.47) primarily due to clinician specimens with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) coded as normal using Screener specimens. However, three cases of HSIL were coded as ASC-US and one as normal using Screener specimens. Seventy-three women had paired high-risk HPV tests with a kappa of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.84). Based on these preliminary findings, a larger study to estimate the performance of the Screener for co-testing cytology and HPV or for HPV testing with cytology triage is warranted.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00702208.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
The clinician's view: role of human papillomavirus testing in the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cytology and cervical cancer precursors.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003 Aug;127(8):950-8. doi: 10.5858/2003-127-950-TCVROH. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003. PMID: 12952506
-
Validation of a new HPV self-sampling device for cervical cancer screening: The Cervical and Self-Sample In Screening (CASSIS) study.Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jun;149(3):491-497. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 17. Gynecol Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29678360 Clinical Trial.
-
The acceptability of a self-lavaging device compared to pelvic examination for cervical cancer screening among low-income women.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Dec;21(12):1275-81. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3512. Epub 2012 Aug 20. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012. PMID: 22906043
-
Overview of human papillomavirus-based and other novel options for cervical cancer screening in developed and developing countries.Vaccine. 2008 Aug 19;26 Suppl 10:K29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.06.019. Vaccine. 2008. PMID: 18847555 Review.
-
Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer.Vaccine. 2012 Nov 20;30 Suppl 5:F88-99. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.095. Vaccine. 2012. PMID: 23199969 Review.
Cited by
-
Cervical Cancer Screening Postpandemic: Self-Sampling Opportunities to Accelerate the Elimination of Cervical Cancer.Int J Womens Health. 2021 Sep 18;13:841-859. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S288376. eCollection 2021. Int J Womens Health. 2021. PMID: 34566436 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Utility of an Human Papillomavirus Genotype Assay for Cancer Screening in Self-Collected Urine and Vaginal Samples from Japanese Women.Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2025;90(2):143-152. doi: 10.1159/000541641. Epub 2024 Oct 7. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2025. PMID: 39374596 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Leyden WA, Manos MM, Geiger AM, Weinmann S, Mouchawar J, et al. (2005) Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst 97: 675–683. - PubMed
-
- Byrd TL, Chavez R, Wilson KM (2007) Barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer screening among Hispanic women. Ethn Dis 17: 129–134. - PubMed
-
- Knops-Dullens T, de Vries N, de Vries H (2007) Reasons for non-attendance in cervical cancer screening programmes: an application of the Integrated Model for Behavioural Change. Eur J Cancer Prev 16: 436–445. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous