Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e84875.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084875. eCollection 2013.

Do topical repellents divert mosquitoes within a community? Health equity implications of topical repellents as a mosquito bite prevention tool

Affiliations

Do topical repellents divert mosquitoes within a community? Health equity implications of topical repellents as a mosquito bite prevention tool

Marta Ferreira Maia et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: Repellents do not kill mosquitoes--they simply reduce human-vector contact. Thus it is possible that individuals who do not use repellents but dwell close to repellent users experience more bites than otherwise. The objective of this study was to measure if diversion occurs from households that use repellents to those that do not use repellents.

Methods: The study was performed in three Tanzanian villages using 15%-DEET and placebo lotions. All households were given LLINs. Three coverage scenarios were investigated: complete coverage (all households were given 15%-DEET), incomplete coverage (80% of households were given 15%-DEET and 20% placebo) and no coverage (all households were given placebo). A crossover study design was used and coverage scenarios were rotated weekly over a period of ten weeks. The placebo lotion was randomly allocated to households in the incomplete coverage scenario. The level of compliance was reported to be close to 100%. Mosquito densities were measured through aspiration of resting mosquitoes. Data were analysed using negative binomial regression models.

Findings: Repellent-users had consistently fewer mosquitoes in their dwellings. In villages where everybody had been given 15%-DEET, resting mosquito densities were fewer than half that of households in the no coverage scenario (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR]=0.39 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.60); p<0.001). Placebo-users living in a village where 80% of the households used 15%-DEET were likely to have over four-times more mosquitoes (IRR=4.17; 95% CI: 3.08-5.65; p<0.001) resting in their dwellings in comparison to households in a village where nobody uses repellent.

Conclusions: There is evidence that high coverage of repellent use could significantly reduce man-vector contact but with incomplete coverage evidence suggests that mosquitoes are diverted from households that use repellent to those that do not. Therefore, if repellents are to be considered for vector control, strategies to maximise coverage are required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mosquito collection sites and some households of the Mbingu area, Kilombero Valley, Tanzania.
A – Household made with thatch wall and thatch roof with a blue barrel and a car tyre serving as artificial resting places. B – Household made with brick walls and thatch roof, the artificial resting places are not visible because they were deployed behind the household. C – Household made of mud walls and thatch roof with a blue barrel and a car tyre serving as artificial resting places. D – Kibanda, outdoor kitchen area.

References

    1. Carroll SP, Loye J (2006) PMD, a registered botanical mosquito repellent with deet-like efficacy. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 22: 507-514. Available online at: doi:10.2987/8756-971X(2006)22[507:PARBMR]2.0.CO;2. PubMed: 17067054 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moore SJ, Darling ST, Sihuincha M, Padilla N, Devine GJ (2007) A low-cost repellent for malaria vectors in the Americas: results of two field trials in Guatemala and Peru. Mal J 6: 101. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-6-101. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hill N, Lenglet A, Arnez AM, Carneiro I (2007) Randomised, double-blind control trial of p-menthane diol repellent against malaria in Bolivia. BMJ 55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rowland M, Downey G, Rab A, Freeman T, Mohammad N et al. (2004) DEET mosquito repellent provides personal protection against malaria: a household randomized trial in an Afghan refugee camp in Pakistan. Trop Med Int Health 9: 335-342. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01198.x. PubMed: 14996362. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ditzen M, Pellegrino M, Vosshall LB (2008) Insect odorant receptors are molecular targets of the insect repellent DEET. Science 319: 1838-1842. doi: 10.1126/science.1153121. PubMed: 18339904. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types