Comparison of mastectomy with breast-conserving surgery in invasive lobular carcinoma: 15-Year results
- PMID: 24376985
- PMCID: PMC3863215
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2011.06.005
Comparison of mastectomy with breast-conserving surgery in invasive lobular carcinoma: 15-Year results
Abstract
Background: Invasive lobular cancer (ILC) is biologically distinct from invasive ductal cancer and there is disagreement regarding appropriate local management of this disease.
Aim: The current study reports long term results comparing mastectomy with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in the treatment of ILC.
Material and methods: Study includes 235 women with ILC treated between 1983 and 1987. All of them underwent axillary dissection and either mastectomy (n = 163) or BCS (n = 72). 50 Gy adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) was given for 53 BCS and 81 mastectomy patients. The BCS group was compared with the mastectomy group.
Results: Patients treated with mastectomy or BCS had a similar outcome at 15 years with regard to distant metastasis-free (62% vs. 70%; p, 0.2017) and breast cancer-specific (62% vs. 70%; p, 0.1728) survival. In the BCS group the actuarial rate of ipsilateral in breast recurrences was 10% with and 53% without RT at 15 years (relative risk [RR], 0.10; p < 0.0001). In the mastectomy group the actuarial rate of chest wall recurrences was 16% with and 13% without RT at 15 years (RR, 1.45; p, 0.3965). Isolated ipsilateral in breast recurrence did not (RR, 1.73; p, 0.2767) but isolated chest-wall recurrence did (RR, 2.65; p, 0.0089) adversely affect cause-specific survival.
Conclusion: Breast cancer specific survival is not affected by the type of surgical treatment. BCS and RT is a safe option to control local disease in patients with ILC.
Keywords: Breast-conserving therapy; Invasive lobular breast cancer; Mastectomy.
Similar articles
-
[Local relapse in young (< or = 40 years) women with breast cancer after mastectomy or breast conserving surgery: 15-year results].Magy Onkol. 2005;49(3):203, 205-8. Epub 2005 Oct 25. Magy Onkol. 2005. PMID: 16249814 Hungarian.
-
[Breast-conserving treatment for early invasive lobular breast cancer: 15 years results].Magy Seb. 2001 Aug;54(4):209-14. Magy Seb. 2001. PMID: 11550486 Hungarian.
-
Local recurrences and distant metastases after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Jan 1;43(1):25-38. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00365-4. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999. PMID: 9989511
-
Patterns of invasive recurrence among patients originally treated for ductal carcinoma in situ by breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;186(3):617-624. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06129-3. Epub 2021 Mar 6. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021. PMID: 33675490 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Overall survival according to type of surgery in young (≤40 years) early breast cancer patients: A systematic meta-analysis comparing breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy.Breast. 2015 Jun;24(3):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 23. Breast. 2015. PMID: 25728282 Review.
Cited by
-
Comprehensive Review of Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Features of Invasive Lobular Cancer.Oncologist. 2021 Jun;26(6):e943-e953. doi: 10.1002/onco.13734. Epub 2021 Mar 16. Oncologist. 2021. PMID: 33641217 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Was Reexcision Less Frequent for Patients with Lobular Breast Cancer After Publication of the SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines?Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;26(12):3856-3862. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07751-8. Epub 2019 Aug 27. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31456094 Free PMC article.
-
The role of liver resection in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review examining the survival impact.Ir J Med Sci. 2018 Nov;187(4):1009-1020. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1746-9. Epub 2018 Feb 1. Ir J Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 29392651
-
Breast reconstruction during the COVID-19 pandemic in resource-limited settings.GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2021 Sep 8;10:Doc10. doi: 10.3205/iprs000160. eCollection 2021. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2021. PMID: 34595087 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Differences in sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma of the breast and implications on surgery-A systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast. 2022 Feb;61:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.11.017. Epub 2021 Dec 1. Breast. 2022. PMID: 34864494 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kurtz J.M., Jacquemier J., Torhorst J. Conservation therapy for breast cancers other than infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Cancer. 1989;63:1630–1635. - PubMed
-
- Schnitt S.J., Connolly J.L., Recht A. Influence of infiltrating lobular histology on local tumor control in breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy. Cancer. 1989;64:448–454. - PubMed
-
- Poen J.C., Tran L., Juillard G. Conservation therapy for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Cancer. 1992;69:2789–2795. - PubMed
-
- Weiss M.C., Fowble B.L., Solin L.J. Outcome of conservative therapy for invasive breast cancer by histologic subtype. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;23:941–947. - PubMed
-
- Silverstein M.J., Lewinsky B.S., Waisman J.R. Infiltrating lobular cancer. Is it different from infiltrating duct carcinoma. Cancer. 1994;73:1673–1677. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources