Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jan-Feb;49(1):42-8.
doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.6.11. Epub 2013 Dec 30.

Cervical spine motion during football equipment-removal protocols: a challenge to the all-or-nothing endeavor

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cervical spine motion during football equipment-removal protocols: a challenge to the all-or-nothing endeavor

Bradley Jacobson et al. J Athl Train. 2014 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Context: The National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement on acute management of the cervical spine-injured athlete recommended the all-or-nothing endeavor, which involves removing or not removing both helmet and shoulder pads, from equipment-laden American football and ice hockey athletes. However, in supporting research, investigators have not considered alternative protocols.

Objective: To measure cervical spine movement (head relative to sternum) produced when certified athletic trainers (ATs) use the all-or-nothing endeavor and to compare these findings with the movement produced using an alternative pack-and-fill protocol, which involves packing the area under and around the cervical neck and head with rolled towels.

Design: Crossover study.

Setting: Movement analysis laboratory.

Patients or other participants: Eight male collegiate football players (age = 21.4 ± 1.4 years; height = 1.87 ± 0.02 m; mass = 103.6 ± 12.5 kg).

Intervention(s): Four ATs removed equipment under 4 conditions: removal of helmet only followed by placing the head on the ground (H), removal of the helmet only followed by pack-and-fill (HP), removal of the helmet and shoulder pads followed by placing the head on the ground (HS), and removal of the helmet and shoulder pads followed by pack-and-fill (HSP). Motion capture was used to track the movement of the head with respect to the sternum during equipment removal.

Main outcome measure(s): We measured head movement relative to sternum movement (translations and rotations). We used 4 × 4 analyses of variance with repeated measures to compare discrete motion variables (changes in position and total excursions) among protocols and ATs.

Results: Protocol HP resulted in a 0.1 ± 0.6 cm rise in head position compared with a 1.4 ± 0.3 cm drop with protocol HS (P < .001). Protocol HP produced 4.9° less total angular excursion (P < .001) and 2.1 cm less total vertical excursion (P < .001) than protocol HS.

Conclusions: The pack-and-fill protocol was more effective than shoulder pad removal in minimizing cervical spine movement throughout the equipment-removal process. This study provides evidence for including the pack-and-fill protocol in future treatment recommendations when helmet removal is necessary for on-field care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Experimental setup. One athletic trainer worked as the remover, and one worked as the stabilizer. The motions of the head and torso were monitored using motion-capture technology throughout 4 different protocols.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean changes in head relative to torso position between initiation and release. A, Cervical flexion (+) /extension (–). All pairwise protocol comparisons were different (P < .008). B, Vertical position (up [+]/down [–] relative to neutral calibration). All pairwise protocol comparisons were different (P < .008). We found no protocol-athletic-trainer interactions. Abbreviations: H, removal of the helmet only followed by placing the head on the ground; HP, removal of the helmet only followed by packing the area under and around the head with towels; HS, removal of the helmet and shoulder pads followed by placing the head on the ground; and HSP, removal of the helmet and shoulder pads followed by packing the area under and around the head.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Total excursion throughout the removal process (maximum – minimum). A, Cervical flexion/extension excursions. All pairwise comparisons were different (P < .008). B, Vertical linear excursions. With the exception of the comparison between protocols H and HS, all pairwise protocol comparisons were different (P < .008). We found no protocol-athletic trainer interactions. Abbreviations: H, removal of the helmet only followed by placing the head on the ground; HP, removal of the helmet only followed by packing the area under and around the head with towels; HS, removal of the helmet and shoulder pads followed by placing the head on the ground; and HSP, removal of the helmet and shoulder pads followed by packing the area under and around the head.

References

    1. Mueller F, Cantu R. Annual Survey of Catastrophic Football Injuries, 1977–2010. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina;; 2011.
    1. Mueller F, Cantu R. Annual Survey of Football Injury Research, 1931–2011. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina;; 2012.
    1. Swartz EE, Floyd RT, Cendoma M. Cervical spine functional anatomy and the biomechanics of injury due to compressive loading. J Athl Train. 2005;40(3):155–161. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crisco JJ, Fiore R, Beckwith JG, et al. Frequency and location of head impact exposures in individual collegiate football players. J Athl Train. 2010;45(6):549–559. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heck JF. The incidence of spearing during a high school's 1975 and 1990 football seasons. J Athl Train. 1996;31(1):31–37. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types