Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;23(4):821-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3137-2. Epub 2013 Dec 31.

Back pain in patients with degenerative spine disease and intradural spinal tumor: what to treat? when to treat?

Affiliations

Back pain in patients with degenerative spine disease and intradural spinal tumor: what to treat? when to treat?

David Bellut et al. Eur Spine J. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Back pain is common in industrialized countries and one of the most frequent causes of work incapacity. Successful treatment is, therefore, not only important for improving the symptoms and the quality of life of these patients but also for socioeconomic reasons. Back pain is frequently caused by degenerative spine disease. Intradural spinal tumors are rare with an annual incidence of 2-4/1,00,000 and are mostly associated with neurological deficits and radicular and nocturnal pain. Back pain is not commonly described as a concomitant symptom, such that in patients with both a tumor and degenerative spine disease, any back pain is typically attributed to the degeneration rather than the tumor.

Objective: The aim of the present retrospective investigation was to study and analyze the impact of microsurgery on back/neck pain in patients with intradural spinal tumor in the presence of degenerative spinal disease in adjacent spinal segments.

Methods: Fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent microsurgical, intradural tumor surgery using a standardized protocol assisted by multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring. Clinical symptoms, complications and surgery characteristics were documented. Standardized questionnaires were used to measure outcome from the surgeon's and the patient's perspectives (Spine Tango Registry and Core Outcome Measures Index). Follow-up included clinical and neuroradiological examinations 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year postoperatively.

Results: Back/neck pain as a leading symptom and coexisting degenerative spine disease was present in 27/58 (47 %) of the tumor patients, and these comprised to group under study. Patients underwent tumor surgery only, without addressing the degenerative spinal disease. Remission rate after tumor removal was 85 %. There were no major surgical complications. Back/neck pain as the leading symptom was eradicated in 67 % of patients. There were 7 % of patients who required further invasive therapy for their degenerative spinal disease.

Conclusions: Intradural spinal tumor surgery improves back/neck pain in patients with coexisting severe degenerative spinal disease. Intradural spinal tumors seem to be the only cause of back/neck pain more often than appreciated. In these patients suffering from both pathologies, there is a higher risk of surgical overtreatment than undertreatment. Therefore, elaborate clinical and radiological examinations should be performed preoperatively and the indication for stabilization/fusion should be discussed carefully in patients foreseen for first time intradural tumor surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
COMI data of Back Pain (18 patients) and No Back Pain (9 patients) groups showing COMI scores for back pain and quality of life preoperatively and at 3- and 12-month follow-ups. (P values: + = 0.035, x = 0.001, ++ = 0.034, * = 0.001)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Illustrative case of 73-year-old patient with a cervical Schwannoma level C6/7 and cervical multi-level discopathy and spondylarthrosis. Preoperative MRI study: ac preoperative MRI study (T1 contrast sagittal), df postoperative MRI study (T1 contrast enhanced axial, sagittal, f T2 sagittal)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Illustrative case of 60-year-old patient with lumbar Schwannoma level L3/4, lumbar spinal canal stenosis level L4/5 and discopathy and spondylarthrosis level L2/3. ac Preoperative MRI study (T1 contrast enhanced axial, sagittal, T2 sagittal), df postperative MRI study (T1 contrast enhanced axial, sagittal, T2 sagittal)

References

    1. Bressler HB, Keyes WJ, Rochon PA, et al. The prevalence of low back pain in the elderly: a systematic review of the literature. Spine. 1999;24:1813–1819. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199909010-00011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Celestin J, Edwards RR, Jamison RN. Pretreatment psychosocial variables as predictors of outcomes following lumbar surgery and spinal cord stimulation: a systematic review and literature synthesis. Pain Med. 2009;10(4):639–653. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00632.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abul-Kasim K, Thurnher MM, McKeever P, et al. Intradural spinal tumors: current classification and MRI features. Neuroradiology. 2008;50:301–314. doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-0345-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hermann DM, Barth A, Porchet F, et al. Nocturnal positional lumboischialgia—presenting symptom of lumbar spinal tumours. J Neurol. 2008;255:1836–1837. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0998-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gezen F, Kahraman S, Canakci Z, et al. Review of 36 cases of spinal cord meningeoma. Spine. 2000;25(6):727–731. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200003150-00013. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources