Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013:2013:260131.
doi: 10.1155/2013/260131. Epub 2013 Nov 28.

Relaparoscopic treatment of recurrences after previous laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Affiliations

Relaparoscopic treatment of recurrences after previous laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Metin Ertem et al. Minim Invasive Surg. 2013.

Abstract

Background. Relaparoscopic treatment of inguinal hernia recurrences has become a relatively new concept with favourable results. The purpose of this study was to examine a series of relaparoscopic repair, present technical experiences, and the clinical outcomes in this subset of patients. Patients and Methods. The medical records of five patients who underwent relaparoscopic repair (TAPP or TEP) for a recurrence between March 2005 and September 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Results. All the patients were male with a mean age of 45 years. Technical failures in the previous repairs were the main factors contributing to recurrences. In two re-TEP cases with no previous mesh fixation, the old mesh remained on the peritoneal side during preperitoneal dissection and this greatly facilitated surgical manipulation. The mean operative time was 93 min (range, 45-120 min). There were no conversions, no intraoperative complications, and no morbidity or rerecurrence after a mean follow-up period of 17 months (range, 7-24 months). Conclusion. Relaparoscopic repair appears to be safe and effective in the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia and repeated TEP could be a simpler approach than expected in the presence of no prior mesh fixation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intraoperative view of the previously placed mesh.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Placement of a new mesh.

References

    1. Liem MS, van Duyn EB, van der Graaf Y, van Vroonhoven TJ. Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison. Annals of Surgery. 2003;237(1):136–141. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Langeveld HR, Van't Riet M, Weidema WF, et al. Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with lichtenstein (the level-trial): a randomized controlled trial. Annals of Surgery. 2010;251(5):819–824. - PubMed
    1. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13(4):343–403. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Felix E, Scott S, Crafton B, et al. Causes of recurrence after laparoscopic hernioplasty: a multicenter study. Surgical Endoscopy. 1998;12(3):226–231. - PubMed
    1. Knook MT, Weidema WF, Stassen LPS, van Steensel CJ. Laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernias after endoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surgical Endoscopy. 1999;13(11):1145–1147. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources