Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;38(7):1719-25.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2412-z.

The utility of FAST for initial abdominal screening of major pelvic fracture patients

Affiliations

The utility of FAST for initial abdominal screening of major pelvic fracture patients

Diederik O F Verbeek et al. World J Surg. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is widely used in pelvic fracture patients. We examined the performance of FAST for detecting hemoperitoneum and predicting the need for intra-abdominal hemorrhage control in major pelvic fracture patients.

Methods: A 5-year retrospective study of major pelvic fracture patients was performed. The presence of hemoperitoneum was confirmed on CT or at laparotomy. The need for hemorrhage control was defined as requiring a surgical or radiological intervention for intra-abdominal bleeding. Hemorrhagic shock (HS) patients had a systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg or base deficit of ≥ 6 mEq/L on admission.

Results: A total of 120 patients were included, 42 (35 %) of which had any hemoperitoneum and 21 (18 %) had a moderate-large amount. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of FAST for any hemoperitoneum were 64, 94, 84, and 83 % and for a moderate-large amount they were 86, 86, 56, and 97 %. In HS patients the indices were 68, 93, 88, and 78 % for any hemoperitoneum and 79, 83, 65, and 91 % for a moderate-large amount. For the need for hemorrhage control, FAST had a positive predictive value of 50 % (16/32) in all and 71 % (12/17) in HS patients. The negative predictive value was 99 % (87/88) in all and 97 % (31/32) in HS patients.

Conclusion: FAST had a good to excellent diagnostic accuracy, depending on the size of hemoperitoneum. A positive FAST result (even in HS patients) does not reliably predict the need for immediate intra-abdominal hemorrhage control but a negative FAST result renders the need for an intervention highly unlikely.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1850-68 - PubMed
    1. J Trauma. 1996 Nov;41(5):815-20 - PubMed
    1. J Trauma. 2004 Aug;57(2):278-85; discussion 285-7 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):415-21 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2001 Jun;233(6):843-50 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources