Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):910-6.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002321. Epub 2014 Jan 2.

QNOTE: an instrument for measuring the quality of EHR clinical notes

Harry B Burke  1 , Albert Hoang  2 , Dorothy Becher  2 , Paul Fontelo  3 , Fang Liu  3 , Mark Stephens  4 , Louis N Pangaro  5 , Laura L Sessums  5 , Patrick O'Malley  1 , Nancy S Baxi  6 , Christopher W Bunt  4 , Vincent F Capaldi  6 , Julie M Chen  6 , Barbara A Cooper  6 , David A Djuric  7 , Joshua A Hodge  7 , Shawn Kane  6 , Charles Magee  5 , Zizette R Makary  6 , Renee M Mallory  6 , Thomas Miller  4 , Adam Saperstein  4 , Jessica Servey  4 , Ronald W Gimbel  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

QNOTE: an instrument for measuring the quality of EHR clinical notes

Harry B Burke et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background and objective: The outpatient clinical note documents the clinician's information collection, problem assessment, and patient management, yet there is currently no validated instrument to measure the quality of the electronic clinical note. This study evaluated the validity of the QNOTE instrument, which assesses 12 elements in the clinical note, for measuring the quality of clinical notes. It also compared its performance with a global instrument that assesses the clinical note as a whole.

Materials and methods: Retrospective multicenter blinded study of the clinical notes of 100 outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had been seen in clinic on at least three occasions. The 300 notes were rated by eight general internal medicine and eight family medicine practicing physicians. The QNOTE instrument scored the quality of the note as the sum of a set of 12 note element scores, and its inter-rater agreement was measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient. The Global instrument scored the note in its entirety, and its inter-rater agreement was measured by the Fleiss κ.

Results: The overall QNOTE inter-rater agreement was 0.82 (CI 0.80 to 0.84), and its note quality score was 65 (CI 64 to 66). The Global inter-rater agreement was 0.24 (CI 0.19 to 0.29), and its note quality score was 52 (CI 49 to 55). The QNOTE quality scores were consistent, and the overall QNOTE score was significantly higher than the overall Global score (p=0.04).

Conclusions: We found the QNOTE to be a valid instrument for evaluating the quality of electronic clinical notes, and its performance was superior to that of the Global instrument.

Keywords: Clinical Note; Clinical Quality; Electronic Health Record; Note Quality; QNOTE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Qualitative assessment of clinical notes. Column A is a list of the evaluative elements, and column B is a list of the components of each element.
Figure 2
Figure 2
QNOTE, an instrument that scores the note based on the evaluative criteria (components) of each element.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Global quality instrument.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Study design.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Soto CM, Kleinman KP, Simon SR. Quality and correlates of medical record documentation in the ambulatory care setting. BMC Health Serv Res 2002;2:22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenbloom ST, Stead WW, Denny JC, et al. Generating clinical notes for electronic health record systems. Appl Clin Inform 2010;1:232–43 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuenssberg EV. Volume and cost of keeping records in a group practice. Br Med J 1956;1(Suppl 2681):341–3 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dearing WP. Quality of medical care. Calif Med 1963;98:331–5 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weed LL. The importance of medical records. Can Fam Physician 1969;15:23–5 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types