Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Mar 14:126:25-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 31.

Sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in sweet ageusic T1r3 and Calhm1 knockout mice

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in sweet ageusic T1r3 and Calhm1 knockout mice

Anthony Sclafani et al. Physiol Behav. .

Abstract

The present study compared the ability of sweet ageusic T1r3 knockout (KO) and Calhm1 KO mice to acquire preferences for a sucrose-paired flavor as well as for unflavored sucrose. The KO and wildtype (WT) mice were given 24-h one-bottle access to 8% sucrose containing one flavor CS+, e.g., grape) and to water containing a different flavor (CS-, e.g., cherry) over 4 training days. In subsequent two-bottle tests with the flavors in water only, the T1r3 KO and Calhm1 KO mice, like WT mice, preferred the CS+ to the CS-. After training with flavored solutions, both KO groups also preferred unflavored 8% sucrose to water although Calhm1 KO mice required more sugar experience to match the preference of the T1r3 KO mice. These findings demonstrate that Calhm1 KO mice, like T1r3 KO mice and WT mice, are sensitive to the post-oral preference conditioning actions of sucrose and can discriminate sugar from water. Yet, despite their acquired sucrose preferences, the Calhm1 KO and T1r3 KO mice consumed only half as much sugar per day as did WT mice. Thus, sweet taste signaling elements are not needed in the gut for sugar conditioning, but sweet taste signaling in the mouth is essential for the full expression of sugar appetite.

Keywords: 24-h tests; Oral sugar conditioning; Post-oral sugar reward.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean (+sem) 24-h intakes of CS+/Suc and CS- in one-bottle training sessions and CS+ and CS- in two-bottle tests 1-2 (left panels) and of unflavored 8% sucrose and water in two-bottle tests 1-2 and one-bottle training days (right panels) of WT mice (top panels) and T1r3 KO mice (lower panels). Number atop bar represents mean percent preference for the CS+ or sucrose solution. An asterisk indicates a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the data within a pair of bars (CS+/Suc vs. CS-, CS+ vs. CS-, sucrose vs. water); a plus symbol indicates a significant difference between sucrose intake and preference between Test 1 vs. 2; a hash symbol indicates a significant difference between CS+/Suc or sucrose intake between WT and KO mice.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean (+sem) 24-h intakes of CS+/Suc and CS- in one-bottle training sessions and CS+ and CS- in two-bottle tests 1-2 (left panels) and of unflavored 8% sucrose and water in two-bottle tests 1-2 and one-bottle training days (right panels) of WT mice (top panels) and Calhm1 KO mice (lower panels). Number atop bar represents mean percent preference for the CS+ or sucrose solution. An asterisk indicates a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the data within a pair of bars (CS+/Suc vs. CS-, CS+ vs. CS-, sucrose vs. water); a plus symbol indicates a significant difference between sucrose intake and preference between Test 1 vs. 2; a hash symbol indicates a significant difference between CS+/Suc or sucrose intake between WT and KO mice.

References

    1. Ackroff K, Sclafani A. Flavor preference conditioned by oral monosodium glutamate in mice. Chem Senses. 2013;38:745–758. - PubMed
    1. Ackroff K, Sclafani A. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric monosodium glutamate in mice. Chem Senses. 2013;38:759–769. - PubMed
    1. Brasser SM, Norman MB, Lemon CH. T1r3 taste receptor involvement in gustatory neural responses to ethanol and oral ethanol preference. Physiol Genomics. 2010;41:232–243. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chaudhari N, Roper SD. The cell biology of taste. J Cell Biol. 2010;190:285–296. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Damak S, Rong M, Yasumatsu K, Kokrashvili Z, Varadarajan V, Zou S, Jiang P, Ninomiya Y, Margolskee RF. Detection of sweet and umami taste in the absence of taste receptor T1r3. Science. 2003;301:850–853. - PubMed

Publication types