Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Sep;15(3):209-14.
doi: 10.1007/s10195-013-0278-3. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

Primary total hip arthroplasty versus internal fixation in displaced fracture of femoral neck in sexa- and septuagenarians

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Primary total hip arthroplasty versus internal fixation in displaced fracture of femoral neck in sexa- and septuagenarians

Iftikhar H Wani et al. J Orthop Traumatol. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The optimal treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly patient is still under debate. In patients aged 60-80 years, the decision between internal fixation and arthroplasty remains controversial. The primary aim of the present study is to evaluate the functional outcome of patients aged 60-80 years with femoral neck fracture treated with total hip arthroplasty or closed reduction and internal fixation. The secondary aim is to evaluate the incidence of nonunion and avascular necrosis in femoral neck fracture in different age groups.

Materials and methods: We studied 100 patients affected by displaced fracture of the femoral neck from May 2007 through June 2010. There were 60 men and 40 women with mean age of 66 years. Fifty patients were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws (group A), and the other 50 patients with total hip arthroplasty (group B). Mean surgical time, blood loss, duration of hospital stay, Harris hip score, complications, and need for reoperation were recorded.

Results: Harris hip score was significantly higher in group B at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up evaluation. The overall complication rate was 28 % in group A and 32 % in group B, which was not statistically significant. A statistically significant difference was found regarding patients who required reoperation in group A (20 %) compared with group B (no one). The average Harris hip score in the internal fixation group was 90.6 and in the total hip arthroplasty group was 93.7, which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Our study showed an increased risk for intracapsular hip fracture developing nonunion with older age.

Conclusions: Primary total hip arthroplasty compared with internal fixation appears to be a reasonably safe method of treating displaced fracture of femoral neck in elderly patients. We also concluded that outcome regarding hip function is generally better after total hip arthroplasty compared with internal fixation.

Level of evidence: Level II-Prospective cohort study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Keating J (2010) Femoral neck fractures. In: Bucholz RW, Court Brown CM, Heckman JD (eds) Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults, 7th edn, Chap 47. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1561–1562
    1. David Sisk T (1987) Fractures of hip and pelvis. In: Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, vol III, 7th edn. The CV Mosby Company, Washington, p 1720
    1. Tidermark J. Quality of life and femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 2003;74:1–42. doi: 10.1080/03008820310014127. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller CW. Survival and ambulation following hip fracture. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1978;60:930–934. - PubMed
    1. Lieberman JR, Romano PS, Mahendra G, et al. The treatment of hip fractures: variations in care. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:239–244. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000188558.67172.4e. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types