Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Dec;25(6):615-22.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2013.11.10.

Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden in lung cancer

Affiliations
Review

Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden in lung cancer

Piotr Obara et al. Chin J Cancer Res. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Accurate prognosis in patients with lung cancer is important for clinical decision making and treatment selection. The TNM staging system is currently the main method for establishing prognosis. Using this system, patients are grouped into one of four stages based on primary tumor extent, nodal disease, and distant metastases. However, each stage represents a range of disease extent and may not on its own be the best reflection of individual patient prognosis. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) can be used to evaluate the metabolic tumor burden affecting the whole body with measures such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). MTV and TLG have been shown to be significant prognostic factors in patients with lung cancer, independent of TNM stage. These metabolic tumor burden measures have the potential to make lung cancer staging and prognostication more accurate and quantitative, with the goal of optimizing treatment choices and outcome predictions.

Keywords: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET); Lung cancer; metabolic tumor volume (MTV); prognostic factors; total lesion glycolysis (TLG).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS. Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. Eur J Cancer 2001;37:S4-66 - PubMed
    1. Traynor AM, Schiller JH. Systemic treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Drugs Today (Barc) 2004;40:697-710 - PubMed
    1. UyBico SJ , Wu CC, Suh RD, et al. Lung cancer staging essentials: the new TNM staging system and potential imaging pitfalls. Radiographics 2010;30:1163-81 - PubMed
    1. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer, 2002.
    1. Mountain CF. Revisions in the international system for stagingLung cancer. Chest 1997;111:1710-7 - PubMed