Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jan 3:14:2.
doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-2.

Effectiveness of a primary care based complex intervention to promote self-management in patients presenting psychiatric symptoms: study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of a primary care based complex intervention to promote self-management in patients presenting psychiatric symptoms: study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial

Thomas Zimmermann et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Anxiety, Depression and Somatoform (ADSom) disorders are highly prevalent in primary care. Managing these disorders is time-consuming and requires strong commitment on behalf of the General Practitioners (GPs). Furthermore, the management of these patients is restricted by the high patient turnover rates in primary care practices, especially in the German health care system.In order to address this problem, we implement a complex, low-threshold intervention by an Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) using a mixture of case management and counseling techniques to promote self-management in these patients. Here we present the protocol of the "Self-Management Support for Anxiety, Depression and Somatoform Disorders in Primary Care" (SMADS)-Study.

Methods/design: The study is designed as a cluster-randomized controlled trial, comparing an intervention and a control group of 10 primary care practices in each case. We will compare the effectiveness of the intervention applied by an APN with usual GP-care. A total of 340 participants will be enrolled in the study, 170 in either arm. We use the Patient Health Questionnaire-German version (PHQ-D) as a screening tool for psychiatric symptoms, including patients with a score above 5 on any of the three symptom scales. The primary outcome is self-efficacy, measured by the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), here used as a proxy for self-management. As secondary outcomes we include the PHQ-D symptom load and questionnaires regarding coping with illness and health related quality of life. Outcome assessments will be applied 8 weeks and 12 months after the baseline assessment.

Discussion: The SMADS-study evaluates a complex, low threshold intervention for ambulatory patients presenting ADSom-symptoms, empowering them to better manage their condition, as well as improving their motivation to engage in self-help and health-seeking behaviour. The benefit of the intervention will be substantiated, when patients can enhance their expected self-efficacy, reduce their symptom load and engage in more self-help activities to deal with their everyday lives. After successfully evaluating this psychosocial intervention, a new health care model for the management of symptoms of anxiety, depression and somatoform disorders for ambulatory patients could emerge, supplementing the work of the GP.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01726387.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flowchart for recruitment of practices and patients (projected).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Planned recruitment of primary care practices.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Modules of the complex intervention.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Recruitment and flow of patients (projected).

References

    1. Toft T, Fink P, Oernboel E, Christensen K, Frostholm L, Olesen F. Mental disorders in primary care: prevalence and comorbidity among disorders. Results from the functional illness in primary care (FIP) study. Psychol Med. 2005;35:1175–1184. doi: 10.1017/S0033291705004459. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grabe HJ, Baumeister SE, John U, Freyberger HJ, Völzke H. Association of mental distress with health care utilization and costs: a 5-year observation in a general population. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol. 2009;44:835–844. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0005-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olesen J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Wittchen HU, Jönsson B. on behalf of the CDBE2010 study group, the European Brain Council. The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur J Neuro. 2011;19:155–162. - PubMed
    1. van den Bussche H, Eisele M, Schäfer I, Bachmann C, Kaduszkiewicz H. In: Gesundheitsmonitor 2007. Böcken J, Braun B, Amhof R, editor. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung; 2007. Die chronisch Kranken und ihre speziellen Versorgungsprobleme; pp. 54–75. Bertelsmann Stiftung.
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Monahan PO, Löwe B. Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Ann Int Med. 2007;146:317–325. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data