Five-year follow-up of patients treated for coronary artery disease in the face of an increasing burden of co-morbidity and disease complexity (from the NHLBI Dynamic Registry)
- PMID: 24388624
- PMCID: PMC3946649
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.10.039
Five-year follow-up of patients treated for coronary artery disease in the face of an increasing burden of co-morbidity and disease complexity (from the NHLBI Dynamic Registry)
Abstract
Management of coronary artery disease (CAD) has evolved over the past decade, but there are few prospective studies evaluating long-term outcomes in a real-world setting of evolving technical approaches and secondary prevention. The aim of this study was to determine how the mortality and morbidity of CAD has changed in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in the setting of co-morbidities and evolving management. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry was a cohort study of patients undergoing PCI at various time points. Cohorts were enrolled in 1999 (cohort 2, n = 2,105), 2004 (cohort 4, n = 2,112), and 2006 (cohort 5, n = 2,176), and each was followed out to 5 years. Primary outcomes were death, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass grafting, repeat PCI, and repeat revascularization. Secondary outcomes were PCI for new obstructive lesions at 5 years, 5-year rates of death and MI stratified by the severity of coronary artery and co-morbid disease. Over time, patients were more likely to have multiple co-morbidities and more severe CAD. Despite greater disease severity, there was no significant difference in death (16.5% vs 17.6%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74 to 1.08), MI (11.0% vs 10.6%, adjusted HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.08), or repeat PCI (20.4% vs 22.2%, adjusted HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.17) at 5-year follow-up, but there was a significant decrease in coronary artery bypass grafting (9.1% vs 4.3%, adjusted HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.59). Patients with 5 co-morbidities had a 40% to 60% death rate at 5 years. There was a modestly high rate of repeat PCI for new lesions, indicating a potential failure of secondary prevention for this population in the face of increasing co-morbidity. Overall 5-year rates of death, MI, repeat PCI, and repeat PCI for new lesions did not change significantly in the context of increased co-morbidities and complex disease.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures





Similar articles
-
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 24355114
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis (5-year outcomes of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.034. Epub 2014 Jun 6. Am J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24996550 Clinical Trial.
-
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017. PMID: 28100341 Chinese.
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting for left main revascularization: an updated meta-analysis.Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017 Jul 1;3(3):173-182. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx008. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017. PMID: 28838092 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Meta-analysis of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 15;119(12):1949-1956. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.022. Epub 2017 Mar 29. Am J Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28442067 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Procedures.JACC Asia. 2022 Mar 1;2(2):182-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.10.008. eCollection 2022 Apr. JACC Asia. 2022. PMID: 36339122 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome after Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Depends on Age in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease - An Analysis of Relative Survival in a Multicenter Cohort and an OCT Substudy.PLoS One. 2016 Apr 22;11(4):e0154025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154025. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27105207 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding preferences of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease towards revascularisation and optimal medical therapy: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 4;15(6):e094587. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094587. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40467319 Free PMC article.
-
Differences of in-hospital outcomes within patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at institutions with high versus low procedural volume: a report from the Japanese multicentre percutaneous coronary intervention registry.Open Heart. 2018 Jul 11;5(2):e000781. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000781. eCollection 2018. Open Heart. 2018. PMID: 30018774 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complexity and Risk of Adverse Events in relation to High Bleeding Risk among Patients Receiving Drug-Eluting Stents: Insights from a Large Single-Center Cohort Study.J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Apr 25;2020:2985435. doi: 10.1155/2020/2985435. eCollection 2020. J Interv Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32405273 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fang J, Alderman MH, Keenan NL, Ayala C. Acute myocardial infarction hospitalization in the United States, 1979 to 2005. Am J Med. 2010;123:259–266. - PubMed
-
- Venkitachalam L, Kip KE, Mulukutla SR, Selzer F, Laskey W, Slater J, Cohen HA, Wilensky RL, Williams DO, Marroquin OC, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Bunker CH, Kelsey SF. Temporal trends in patient-reported angina at 1 year after percutaneous coronary revascularization in the stent era: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored 1997–2006 dynamic registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2:607–615. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Smith SC, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, Braun LT, Creager MA, Franklin BA, Gibbons RJ, Grundy SM, Hiratzka LF, Jones DW, Lloyd-Jones DM, Minissian M, Mosca L, Peterson ED, Sacco RL, Spertus J, Stein JH, Taubert KA. AHA/ACCF Secondary Prevention and Risk Reduction Therapy for Patients With Coronary and Other Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: 2011 Update: A Guideline From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circulation. 2011;124:2458–2473. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous