Ten-core versus 16-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy for detection of prostatic carcinoma: a prospective comparative study in Indian population
- PMID: 24392441
- PMCID: PMC3879054
- DOI: 10.12954/PI.13025
Ten-core versus 16-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy for detection of prostatic carcinoma: a prospective comparative study in Indian population
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the cancer detection rate in patients with raised serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) results between the 10-core and the 16-core biopsy techniques in an Indian population.
Methods: Between November 2010 and November 2012, 95 men aged >50 years who presented to the Urology Department with lower urinary tract symptoms, elevated serum PSA, and/or abnormal DRE findings underwent transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. A total of 53 patients underwent 10-core biopsy and 42 patients underwent 16-core biopsy.
Results: Of the 53 men in the 10-core group, 8 had cancer, whereas in the 16-core biopsy group, 23 of 42 men had cancer. Detection of prostate cancer was significantly higher in patients who underwent 16-core biopsy than in those who underwent 10-core biopsy (P<0.001). Among the 95 men, 44 men had abnormal DRE findings (46.3%), of whom 23 showed cancer (52.27%). Of 51 men with normal DRE findings and elevated PSA, 8 men had malignancy with a cancer detection rate of 15.68%. Among 20 men with PSA between 4.1 and 10 ng/mL, 2 (10%) had cancer. In 31 men with PSA between 10.1 and 20 ng/mL, 3 cancers (9.67%) were detected, and in 44 men with PSA >20 ng/mL, 26 cancers were detected (59.09%).
Conclusions: The cancer detection rate with 16-core TRUS-guided biopsy is significantly higher than that with 10-core biopsy (54.76% vs. 15.09%, P<0.001). In patients with both normal and abnormal DRE findings, 16-core biopsy has a better detection rate than the 10-core biopsy protocol. With increasing PSA, there is a high rate of detection of prostate cancer in both 10-core and 16-core biopsy patients.
Keywords: Digital rectal examination; Prostate biopsy; Prostate neoplasms; Prostate-specific antigen; Transrectal ultrasonography.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Stratification of prostate-specific antigen level and results of transrectal ultrasonography and digital rectal examination as predictors of positive prostate biopsy.Can Assoc Radiol J. 1997 Aug;48(4):252-8. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1997. PMID: 9282157
-
Experience with an assay for prostate-specific antigen and transrectal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.Br J Urol. 1997 Mar;79(3):439-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.06723.x. Br J Urol. 1997. PMID: 9117228
-
Correlation of digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen levels for detection of prostate cancer: Retrospective analysis results from a tertiary care urology center.J Cancer Res Ther. 2022 Oct-Dec;18(6):1646-1650. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1818_20. J Cancer Res Ther. 2022. PMID: 36412425
-
Evaluation of prostate specific antigen density and transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies in 100 consecutive patients with a negative digital rectal examination and intermediate serum prostate specific antigen levels.Int J Urol. 1997 Jul;4(4):362-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.1997.tb00209.x. Int J Urol. 1997. PMID: 9256325 Review.
-
Need for and relevance of prostate cancer screening in Nigeria.Ecancermedicalscience. 2014 Aug 28;8:457. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2014.457. eCollection 2014. Ecancermedicalscience. 2014. PMID: 25228913 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnosis of prostate cancer via nanotechnological approach.Int J Nanomedicine. 2015 Oct 19;10:6555-69. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S91908. eCollection 2015. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015. PMID: 26527873 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Klein EA. Prostate carcinoma: introduction. In: de la Rosette JJ, Manyak MJ, Harisinghani MG, Wijkstra H, editors. Imaging in oncological urology. London: Springer; 2009. pp. 211–9.
-
- Yeole BB. Trends in the prostate cancer incidence in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008;9:141–4. - PubMed
-
- Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol. 1989;142:71–4. - PubMed
-
- Singh H, Canto EI, Shariat SF, Kadmon D, Miles BJ, Wheeler TM, et al. Improved detection of clinically significant, curable prostate cancer with systematic 12-core biopsy. J Urol. 2004;171:1089–92. - PubMed
-
- Durkan GC, Sheikh N, Johnson P, Hildreth AJ, Greene DR. Improving prostate cancer detection with an extended-core transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy protocol. BJU Int. 2002;89:33–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous