Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Nov;40(12):1690-2.

[The clinical outcomes of endoscopic stent placement for patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction - a comparison with gastrojejunostomy]

[Article in Japanese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 24393890
Comparative Study

[The clinical outcomes of endoscopic stent placement for patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction - a comparison with gastrojejunostomy]

[Article in Japanese]
Kazuhito Tsuchida et al. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Owing to its less invasiveness, endoscopic stent placement is a potential treatment option for gastric cancer patients with gastric outlet obstruction( GOO). We compared the clinical outcomes of stent placement with gastrojejunostomy( GJ) bypass in terms of postoperative oral intake status, duration of oral intake, and overall survival. Thirty-eight patients who had unresectable gastric cancer with GOO were enrolled in this study. The stent placement group was divided into 2 subgroups: group P comprising 9 patients who received palliative treatment; and group A comprising 12 patients who received aggressive chemotherapy. Stent placement was performed for almost all the patients who had massive peritoneal metastasis and poor performance status. Improvement in oral intake was achieved in 19( 90.5%) of 21 patients after stent placement. Moreover, oral intake improved significantly in patients who underwent chemotherapy after stent placement. The median duration of oral intake and median overall survival was shorter in group P (1.8 and 2.8 months, respectively) and group A (3.2 and 4.8 months, respectively) than in group GJ( 11.8 and 12.7 months, respectively). In conclusion, endoscopic stent placement is effective in improving the oral intake status; however, it may be insufficient to improve the duration of oral intake. Thus, further studies are needed to clarify the clinical benefit of stent placement.

PubMed Disclaimer