Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Nov;25(11):1503-8.
doi: 10.1589/jpts.25.1503. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

Effect of Ankle-foot Orthosis on Gait Velocity and Cadence of Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Effect of Ankle-foot Orthosis on Gait Velocity and Cadence of Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review

Luiz Alfredo Braun Ferreira et al. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

[Purpose] The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on gait variables (velocity and cadence) of stroke patients. To do this, a systematic review was conducted of four databases. [Subjects and Methods] The papers identified were evaluated based on the following inclusion criteria: 1) design: controlled, clinical trial; 2) population: stroke patients; 3) intervention: analysis of spatiotemporal variables of gait with an ankle-foot orthosis; 4) control group with different intervention or no intervention; and 5) outcome: improvement in gait velocity or cadence. [Results] Thirteen controlled trials addressing the effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on gait variables of stroke patients were found. They exhibited methodological quality of 3 or more points on the PEDro scale. [Conclusion] While the findings suggest the benefits of an AFO regarding gait velocity, the impact of this type of orthosis on cadence remains inconclusive. Thus, there is a need for further well-designed randomized, controlled, clinical trials to establish better scientific evidence for the effects of AFO usage on gait variables of stroke patients.

Keywords: Gait; Orthosis; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flowchart of studies included in review

References

    1. Ferrarello F, Baccini M, Rinaldi LA, et al. : Efficacy of physiotherapy interventions late after stroke: a meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2011, 82: 136–143 - PubMed
    1. Meilink A, Hemmen B, Seelen HA, et al. : Impact of EMG-triggered neuromuscular stimulation of the wrist and finger extensors of the paretic hand after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil, 2008, 22: 291–305 - PubMed
    1. Belda-Lois JM, Mena-del Horno S, Bermejo-Bosch I, et al. : Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2011, 8: 66 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thaut MH, Kenyon GP, Hurt CP, et al. : Kinematic optimization of spatiotemporal patterns in paretic arm training with stroke patients. Neuropsychologia, 2002, 40: 1073–1081 - PubMed
    1. de Wit DC, Buurke JH, Nijlant JM, et al. : The effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on walking ability in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil, 2004, 18: 550–557 - PubMed