Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jan 5;5(1):58-68.
doi: 10.7150/jca.7047.

Current approaches and challenges in monitoring treatment responses in breast cancer

Affiliations
Review

Current approaches and challenges in monitoring treatment responses in breast cancer

Lindsey J Graham et al. J Cancer. .

Abstract

Monitoring response to treatment is a key element in the management of breast cancer that involves several different viewpoints from surgery, radiology, and medical oncology. In the adjuvant setting, appropriate surgical and pathological evaluation guides adjuvant treatment and follow up care focuses on detecting recurrent disease with the intention of improving long term survival. In the neoadjuvant setting, assessing response to chemotherapy prior to surgery to include evaluation for pathologic response can provide prognostic information to help guide follow up care. In the metastatic setting, for those undergoing treatment, it is crucial to determine responders versus non-responders in order to help guide treatment decisions. In this review, we present the current guidelines for monitoring treatment response in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic setting. In addition, we also discuss challenges that are faced in each setting.

Keywords: Adjuvant; Breast cancer; Future directions; Metastatic; Neo-adjuvant; Treatment monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, Stein K, Mariotto A, Smith T. et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:220–41. doi:10.3322/caac.21149. - PubMed
    1. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M. et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1784–92. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa050518. - PubMed
    1. Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J, Gray R, Arriagada R, Raina V, Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet. 2012. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61963-1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Burzykowski T, Buyse M, Sledge G, Carmichael J, Luck HJ. et al. Taxanes alone or in combination with anthracyclines as first-line therapy of patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1980–6. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.10.8399. - PubMed
    1. Ploos van Amstel FK, van den Berg SW, van Laarhoven HW, Gielissen MF, Prins JB, Ottevanger PB. Distress screening remains important during follow-up after primary breast cancer treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2013. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1764-0. - PubMed