When is birthweight at term abnormally low? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and predictive ability of current birthweight standards for neonatal outcomes
- PMID: 24397731
- PMCID: PMC4162997
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12517
When is birthweight at term abnormally low? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and predictive ability of current birthweight standards for neonatal outcomes
Abstract
Background: Intrauterine growth restriction is a cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. A variety of definitions of low birthweight are used in clinical practice, with a lack of consensus regarding which definitions best predict adverse outcomes.
Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between birthweight standards and neonatal outcome in term-born infants (at ≥ 37 weeks of gestation).
Search strategy: MEDLINE (1966-January 2011), EMBASE (1980-January 2011), and the Cochrane Library (2011:1) and MEDION were included in our search.
Selection criteria: Studies comprising live term-born infants (gestation ≥ 37 completed weeks), with weight or other anthropometric measurements recorded at birth along with neonatal outcomes.
Data collection and analysis: Data were extracted to populate 2 × 2 tables relating birthweight standard with outcome, and meta-analysis was performed where possible.
Main results: Twenty-nine studies including 21 034 114 neonates were selected. Absolute birthweight was strongly associated with mortality, with birthweight < 1.5 kg giving the largest association (OR 48.6, 95% CI 28.62-82.53). When using centile charts, regardless of threshold, the summary odds ratios were significant but closer to 1 than when using absolute birthweight. For all tests, summary predictive ability comprised high specificity and positive likelihood ratio for neonatal death, but low sensitivity and a negative likelihood ratio close to 1.
Author's conclusions: Absolute birthweight is a prognostic factor for neonatal mortality. The indirect evidence suggests that centile charts or other definitions of low birthweight are not as strongly associated with mortality as the absolute birthweight. Further research is required to improve predictive accuracy.
Keywords: Fetal growth restriction; low birthweight; neonatal morbidity; neonatal mortality; systematic review.
© 2014 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Figures



Similar articles
-
When is birthweight at term (≥37 weeks' gestation) abnormally low? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic and predictive ability of current birthweight standards for childhood and adult outcomes.BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):634-42. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13282. Epub 2015 Jan 20. BJOG. 2015. PMID: 25601001 Free PMC article.
-
Planned early delivery versus expectant management of the term suspected compromised baby for improving outcomes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 24;2015(11):CD009433. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009433.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26599471 Free PMC article.
-
Metformin for women who are overweight or obese during pregnancy for improving maternal and infant outcomes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD010564. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010564.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30039871 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar;(176):1-257. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009. PMID: 19408970 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of waterbirth on neonatal mortality and morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):180-231. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2105. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26571292
Cited by
-
FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;152 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3-57. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13522. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021. PMID: 33740264 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal Factors Associated with Low Birth Weight in Term Neonates: A Case-controlled Study.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018 Aug;40(8):444-449. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667341. Epub 2018 Aug 24. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018. PMID: 30142664 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of size at birth on health, growth and developmental outcomes in children up to age 18: an umbrella review.Arch Dis Child. 2023 Dec;108(12):956-969. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324884. Epub 2023 Jun 20. Arch Dis Child. 2023. PMID: 37339859 Free PMC article.
-
The role of genetic testing in small for gestational age infants.J Perinatol. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1038/s41372-025-02343-9. Online ahead of print. J Perinatol. 2025. PMID: 40571843 Review.
-
Maternal socioeconomic and lifestyle factors and life dissatisfaction associated with a small for gestational age infant. The Survey of Neonates in Pomerania (SNiP).Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Apr;307(4):1243-1254. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06598-x. Epub 2022 May 23. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 35599250 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Center for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE) Perinatal Mortality 2009: United Kingdom. London: CMACE; 2011.
-
- Bernstein IM, Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Ohlsson A, Golan L. Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2000;182:198–206. - PubMed
-
- Brodsky D, Christou H, Brodsky D, Christou H. Current concepts in intrauterine growth restriction. J Intensive Care Med. 2004;19:307–19. - PubMed
-
- Bukowski R. Fetal growth potential and pregnancy outcome. Semin Perinatol. 2004;28:51–8. - PubMed
-
- Eichenwald EC, Stark AR, Eichenwald EC, Stark AR. Management and outcomes of very low birth weight. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1700–11. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical