Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Oct-Dec;17(4):521-8.
doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422519398.

Bladeless direct optical trocar insertion in laparoscopic procedures on the obese patient

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Bladeless direct optical trocar insertion in laparoscopic procedures on the obese patient

Andrea Tinelli et al. JSLS. 2013 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Recently, we have shown advantages of a direct optical entry (DOE) using a bladeless trocar in comparison with the open Hasson technique (OHT) in older reproductive-age women with previous operations, as well as in comparison with Veress needle entry in reproductive-age and postmenopausal women.

Objectives: A prospective multicenter randomized study to determine whether the DOE is feasible for establishing safe and rapid entry into the abdomen in comparison with those of the OHT in reproductive-age obese women.

Methods: Two types of surgical techniques were blindly applied in 224 obese reproductive-age women with benign neoplastic diseases of ovary and uterus. Namely, laparoscopic entry into the abdomen in 108 patients was performed by DOE and in 116 women by OHT. Following parameters (entry time in seconds needed to establish the intra-abdominal vision after pneumoperitoneum, blood loss, occurrence of vascular and/or bowel injuries) were compared during surgery as main outcomes.

Results: Main baseline characteristics of patients, including age (36.1 ± 4.5 vs 35.7 ± 5.8), body mass index (34.9 ± 5.1 vs 35.1 ± 4.9 kg/m(2)), and parity (2.1 ± 0.4 vs 1.9 ± 0.9), were not significantly different between the DOE and OHT groups (P > .05). While intraoperative parameters such as the entry time (71.9 ± 3.7 vs 215.1 ± 6.2 seconds) and blood loss value (9.7 ± 6.1 vs 12.2 ± 2.9 mL) were significantly reduced in the DOE group in comparison with those of OHT group (respectively, P < .0001 and < .01), there were also trends to slight decrease of the occurrence of the minor injuries, manifested as omental small vessels rupture (0 of 108 vs 4 of 116) and punctures and pinches of jejunal serosa (0 of 108 vs 3 of 116) in patients of the DOE group in comparison with those of OHT group (respectively, P = .0515 and = .0925).

Conclusions: DOE reduced entry time and blood loss with trends to slightly decrease of the occurrence of the minor vascular and bowel injuries, thus enabling a possible alternative to OHT in obese women; however, further larger trials need to confirm the possible additional benefits of a DOE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study design. DOE, direct optical entry; OHT, open Hasson technique.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
After umbilical incision and trocar lighted-tip positioning on umbilical cutting (A), both surgeons grab and elevate the abdomen, and the first surgeon grasps the handle of the trocar and introduces it into the umbilical incision (B).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Alternatively, in cases of difficulty, the surgeons grab and elevate the abdomen with 2 Kocher forceps to prevent it from sliding and slipping away from the skin at the trocar entry site.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
After peritoneal overcoming and abdominal entry, the 0° laparoscope without the obturator is reinserted to check proper position of the trocar cannula and pneumoperitoneum is immediately performed. The entry site and adjacent viscera are inspected promptly for continuing the operation and positioning the ancillary trocars (the photo displays an obese women with a BMI of 36 kg/m2 with positioned ancillary trocars).

References

    1. Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Schneider AJ, et al. First abdominal access in gynecological laparoscopy: which method to utilize? [in Italian]. Minerva Ginecol. 2006;58(5):429–440 - PubMed
    1. Tinelli A. Laparoscopic Entry: Traditional Methods, New Insights and Novel Approaches. London, UK: Springer, 2012
    1. Ahmad G, O'Flynn H, Duffy JM, Phillips K, Watson A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2:CD006583. - PubMed
    1. Ambardar S, Cabot J, Cekic V, et al. Abdominal wall dimensions and umbilical position vary widely with BMI and should be taken into account when choosing port locations. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(9):1995–2000 - PubMed
    1. Stany MP, Winter WE, 3rd, Dainty L, Lockrow E, Carlson JW. Laparoscopic exposure in obese high-risk patients with mechanical displacement of the abdominal wall. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(2):383–386 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources