Effects of subchronic treatment with imipramine, zimelidine and alaproclate on regional tissue levels of substance P- and neurokinin A/neurokinin B-like immunoreactivity in the brain and spinal cord of the rat

Abstract

The effects of subchronic (14 day) treatment with the inhibitors at the uptake of monoamines, zimelidine, alaproclate and imipramine, on regional levels of substance P (SP) and other tachykinins in tissue in the central nervous system of the rat were studied by radioimmunoassay. In the ventral spinal cord, in which substance P is known to exist together with 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), in the terminals of descending neurones, treatment with the selective inhibitors of the uptake of 5-HT zimelidine (2 X 10 mumol/kg p.o.) or alaproclate (2 X 10 mumol/kg or 2 X 20 mumol/kg p.o.), increased the level of substance P-like immunoreactivity (SP-LI). The effect of alaproclate appeared to be dose-dependent. After treatment with imipramine (2 X 10 mumol/kg p.o.) only a tendency to increased levels of substance P-like immunoreactivity spinal cord was seen. Treatment with alaproclate, at the highest dose level, also elevated the concentration of neurokinin A/neurokinin B-like immunoreactivity (NKA/NKB-LI) in the ventral spinal cord. In the frontal cortex, in which separate monoaminergic and tachykinin-containing neurones interact, treatment with imipramine reduced the levels of SP-LI and NKA/NKB-LI, while treatment with alaproclate had the opposite effect. In the periaqueductal grey matter, treatment with zimelidine and alaproclate increased the levels of SP-LI and NKA/NKB-LI, while treatment with imipramine increased only the level of NKA/NKB-LI. In conclusion, subchronic treatment of rats with inhibitors of the uptake of monoamines induced changes in levels of tachykinin in frontal cortex, periaqueductal grey and spinal cord. The selective inhibitors of the uptake zimelidine and alaproclate, had similar effects on levels of tachykinin, while the inhibitor of the uptake of 5-HT and noradrenaline, imipramine induced changes in the frontal cortex, which were qualitatively different from the effects of zimelidine and alaproclate. Furthermore, the levels of different tachykinins were not always changed in parallel by the same treatment.