Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1987 May;10(3 Pt 1):497-502.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1987.tb04512.x.

Internal ventricular defibrillation with sequential pulse countershock in pigs: comparison with single pulses and effects of pulse separation

Comparative Study

Internal ventricular defibrillation with sequential pulse countershock in pigs: comparison with single pulses and effects of pulse separation

D L Jones et al. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1987 May.

Abstract

We compared single to sequential pulse shocks with different pulse separations on internal cardiac defibrillation by using a catheter and plaque electrodes in open-chest halothane-anesthetized pigs. Ten seconds after fibrillation onset, defibrillation was attempted using trapezoidal pulses of 65% tilt, approximately 5 ms duration and fixed outputs from 1.0 to 50 joules (J). With single pulses, minimum defibrillation energy for the catheter alone was 2.4 +/- 0.3 J/kg (mean +/- standard error) and 2.1 +/- 0.2 J/kg for the catheter tip to plaque configuration. With sequential pulse shocks, the first pulse delivered via the catheter and the second pulse from the catheter tip to the plaque electrode, the energy necessary for defibrillation was dependent on the separation time between the two pulses (2.0 +/- 0.2, 1.5 +/- 0.2, 0.9 +/- 0.1, 1.3 +/- 0.3, 0.6 +/- 0.2, and 1.2 +/- 0.2 J/kg at 100, 10, 1, 0.5, 0.2, and 0.1 ms, respectively). Further, at the 0.2 ms separation, 100% of the animals could be defibrillated with less than 2.0 J/kg (35 J total). We conclude that sequential pulse defibrillation provides a significant improvement over single pulse defibrillation. The optimum separation between the sequential pulses in this study was 0.2 ms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources