Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 Apr;35(2):101-4.
doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1020206.

Lead fracture in pacemaker patients

Lead fracture in pacemaker patients

E Alt et al. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987 Apr.

Abstract

We studied the incidence of lead fractures in 2,226 patients with a total follow-up period of 8,558 patient years. Lead fractures occurred in 100 out of 2,563 implanted leads (3.9%). This corresponds to an average rate of 1.2% per patient year. We found 62 out of 881 singlefilar coil leads fractured (7.0%), 20 out of 809 Siemens Elema 588 leads (2.5%) and only 6 out of 630 multifilar soil leads (1.0%). Lead fractures occurred at a significantly (p less than 0.05) higher rate in singlefilar coil leads than in Simens Elema 588 leads or in multifilar coil leads. Independent of the type of lead, a significantly (p less than 0.05) higher fracture rate was found with leads implanted through the internal jugular vein. Most fractures occurred either inside the pacemaker pocket or on the way from the connector to the venous entry. Only 7% of all fractures occurred within the vascular system. Patients with a second or third degree AV-block and a multifilar coil lead implanted showed a significantly (p less than 0.05) better survival rate compared to those with a singlefilar coil or a Siemens Elema 588 lead. In pacemaker-dependent patients a replacement of singlefilar coil leads might be considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources