Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan 9;5(1):3.
doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-5-3.

Effect of dietary defatted diatom biomass on egg production and quality of laying hens

Affiliations

Effect of dietary defatted diatom biomass on egg production and quality of laying hens

Xiangjun Leng et al. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. .

Abstract

Background: This study was to determine if feeding laying hens with defatted diatom microalgal biomass (DFA) from biofuel production affected their egg production and health status.

Methods: Five replicates of 5 individually caged ISA Babcock White leghorn hens were fed 4 diets, including a corn-soybean meal control diet, a diet containing 7.5% DFA substituting for soybean meal, and diets containing 7.5% or 15% DFA substituting for corn and soybean meal. Body weights, feed intake, feed conversion ratio (FCR), rate of egg production, egg size, egg mass, and several characteristics of eggs were determined at 4 and 8 wk. Venous blood was sampled at 4 and 8 wk for measurement of 5 biomarkers of health.

Results: The 15% DFA diet decreased (P < 0.05) feed intake, egg production, and plasma uric acid concentrations as compared with the control diet, but increased (P < 0.05) egg albumen weight and height compared with the 7.5% DFA diets. The two levels of DFA produced dose-dependent (P < 0.05) changes in three color measures of egg yolk, without affecting four hen plasma biochemical indicators of health.

Conclusions: Feeding laying hens with 7.5% DFA in the corn-soybean meal diet for 8 wk had no adverse effect on their health, egg production, or egg quality, but 15% inclusion reduced feed intake, egg production, and efficiency of feed utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gouveia L, Oliveira AC. Microalgae as raw material for biofuels production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;36:269–274. doi: 10.1007/s10295-008-0495-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spolaore P, Joannis-Cassan C, Duran E, Isambert A. Commercial applications of microalgae. J Biosci Bioeng. 2006;101(2):87–96. doi: 10.1263/jbb.101.87. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Becker W. In: Handbook of Microalgal Culture: Biotechnology and Applied Phycology. Richmond A, editor. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2004. Microalgae in Human and Animal Nutrition; pp. 312–351.
    1. Becker EW. Micro-algae as a source of protein. Biotechnol Adv. 2007;25:207–210. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.11.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Economics, Statistics, and Market Information System. Washington, DC: Oil Crops, Situation and Outlook Yearbook; 2011.

LinkOut - more resources