Baha-mediated rehabilitation of patients with unilateral deafness: selection criteria
- PMID: 24401757
- DOI: 10.1159/000354272
Baha-mediated rehabilitation of patients with unilateral deafness: selection criteria
Abstract
The aim of our study was to identify clinical criteria for optimizing rehabilitation of patients with unilateral deafness using the Baha device. We made a retrospective study of 102 patients with unilateral deafness requesting auditory rehabilitation over a period of 5 years. All subjects underwent a series of stereo audiometric tests, with and without Baha worn on a headband, and were then referred to a hearing care specialist for a real life trial of 15 days. The Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI) questionnaire was administered. Patients refusing the implantation were retrospectively submitted to a questionnaire specifically designed to ask the reasons for refusal. We measured stereo audiometric test results, age, aetiology of deafness, duration of auditory deprivation on the rehabilitated ear, and GHSI score. At the conclusion of testing, the implantation rate was 29%. During preoperative testing, the improvement in understanding of speech-in-noise was 22 ± 11% for patients agreeing to the implantation versus 13 ± 11% for patients refusing the implantation. Age, aetiology of deafness and duration of auditory deprivation had no influence on the implantation decision. Speech-in-noise testing and aided stereo audiometric gain were the only two measures showing statistically significant differences between the groups agreeing to and refusing the implantation. There were multiple reasons for refusal of the implantation. Among these, the four principal reasons were: absence of perceived benefit during stereo audiometric testing (59%), requirement for surgery (35%), cost of the solution (44%), and aesthetics (41%). Hence, no other criteria except the preoperative improvement in understanding of speech-in-noise and the aided gain from Baha worn on a headband were found to be predictive of the patient's acceptance of surgical implantation of a bone-anchored implant/abutment for Baha. Speech-in-noise testing with and without Baha worn on a headband has a role to play in deciding on the implantation of a bone-anchored hearing solution.
Similar articles
-
Long-term benefit and sound localization in patients with single-sided deafness rehabilitated with an osseointegrated bone-conduction device.Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jan;34(1):111-4. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827a2020. Otol Neurotol. 2013. PMID: 23202156
-
Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.Otol Neurotol. 2006 Feb;27(2):172-82. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000196421.30275.73. Otol Neurotol. 2006. PMID: 16436986
-
Patient satisfaction and functional results with the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA).Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2011 Jun;128(3):107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2010.09.009. Epub 2011 May 20. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2011. PMID: 21601551
-
The bone-anchored hearing aid for children: recent developments.Int J Audiol. 2008 Sep;47(9):554-9. doi: 10.1080/14992020802307354. Int J Audiol. 2008. PMID: 18821224 Review.
-
The evidence base for the application of contralateral bone anchored hearing aids in acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in adults.Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Feb;31(1):6-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01137.x. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16441794 Review.
Cited by
-
Cochlear Implantation and Other Treatments in Single-Sided Deafness and Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Results of a National Multicenter Study Including a Randomized Controlled Trial.Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(6):414-424. doi: 10.1159/000514085. Epub 2021 Mar 31. Audiol Neurootol. 2021. PMID: 33789270 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Auditory Rehabilitation in Single-Sided-Deafened Patients after Surgery to the Cerebellopontine Angle for Vestibular Schwannoma: What Is the Patient's Choice?J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 8;13(19):5967. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195967. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39408027 Free PMC article.
-
Choice of treatment evaluated after trial periods with bone conduction devices and contralateral routing of sound systems in patients with single-sided deafness.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Dec 27;8(1):192-200. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1002. eCollection 2023 Feb. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 36846432 Free PMC article.
-
Bone-anchored hearing aids in conductive and mixed hearing losses: why do patients reject them?Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Oct;273(10):3117-22. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-3941-5. Epub 2016 Feb 19. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016. PMID: 26894416
-
Sound-localization performance of patients with single-sided deafness is not improved when listening with a bone-conduction device.Hear Res. 2019 Feb;372:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Apr 19. Hear Res. 2019. PMID: 29703651 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical