Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 May;85(5):407-15.
doi: 10.1007/s00104-013-2654-1.

[Assessment of the benefit of medical devices in surgical practice. Problems and possible solutions]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[Assessment of the benefit of medical devices in surgical practice. Problems and possible solutions]

[Article in German]
D Seidel et al. Chirurg. 2014 May.

Abstract

The market approval of medical devices in Germany does not yet require a benefit assessment. Thus, there is a lack of high quality studies that clearly prove the benefit of medical innovations. In the past, the Federal Joint Committee in Germany (G-BA) did not have the opportunity to adequately address this issue of lacking evidence. A law for the improvement of the care structure in the statutory health insurance offers the possibility for the G-BA to obtain evidence for the benefit of medical practice. With an integrated regulation for testing of medical devices the manufacturers have the option to apply for an assessment of new and established treatment methods and to provide scientific evidence for the benefit of medical devices as a requirement for inclusion in the catalogue of services of the statutory health insurance. However, this expanded scope of action is also a challenge for clinicians. The already existing problem of integrating multicenter clinical trials in the surgical routine will remain. The Surgical Study Network Germany (CHIR-Net) offers an ideal way to cope with the increased requirements on studies in the field of medical devices through established partnerships with methodological institutions and practitioners in clinical settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. BMJ. 2011 May 13;342:d2905 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2013 May 07;346:f2771 - PubMed
    1. Chirurg. 2008 Apr;79(4):365-7 - PubMed
    1. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2009 Apr;52(4):444-50 - PubMed
    1. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jun 13;171(11):1006-11 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources