Long-term outcome in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease treated with culprit-only, immediate, or staged multivessel percutaneous revascularization strategies: Insights from the REAL registry
- PMID: 24403174
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25374
Long-term outcome in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease treated with culprit-only, immediate, or staged multivessel percutaneous revascularization strategies: Insights from the REAL registry
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the differences in cardiac outcomes for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) as a function of whether they underwent culprit-only primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) or multivessel PCI, either during PPCI or as a staged procedure.
Background: MVD occurs in about 40% of patients presenting with STEMI, and it has been associated with a worse outcome compared to single-vessel disease. The most favorable PCI strategy for dealing with significant nonculprit lesions has to be established.
Methods: A total of 2061 STEMI patients with MVD undergoing PPCI, prospectively enrolled in the REAL Registry between July 2002 and December 2010, were considered: 706 underwent culprit-only PPCI; 367 multivessel PCI during the index procedure; 988 had a staged PCI within 60 days. Mortality and outcomes were calculated at 30 days and 2 years.
Results: At multivariate analysis, culprit-only PPCI was associated with higher rates of cardiac outcomes as compared to staged multivessel PCI, taken as reference [Hazard Ratio (HR): 2.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-5.89, P = 0.006 for 30-day mortality, and HR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.35-2.74, P = 0.0002 for 2-year mortality, respectively]. Short-term mortality rates were higher in multivessel PCI group as compared to staged PCI group (HR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.06-6.26, P = 0.03); no differences were observed at 2-year follow-up (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.64-1.82, P = 0.76).
Conclusions: Our findings support the current guidelines recommendation to perform culprit-only PPCI in STEMI patients with MVD without hemodynamic compromise, followed by a staged PCI of noninfarct-related significant lesions.
Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; angioplasty; coronary artery disease; stent.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment in
-
Culprit only, multivessel, or staged multivessel intervention in STEMI: new insights or insurmountable methodologic obstacles?Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 15;84(6):923-4. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25673. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 25352189 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan;3(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.017. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010. PMID: 20129564
-
Culprit Vessel-Only vs. Staged Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategies in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Circ J. 2016;80(2):371-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0493. Epub 2015 Nov 20. Circ J. 2016. PMID: 26597353 Clinical Trial.
-
Prognostic impact of staged versus "one-time" multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):704-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.071. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21816305
-
Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jun 1;115(11):1481-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.02.046. Epub 2015 Mar 12. Am J Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25840579 Review.
-
Culprit-Only vs. Complete Revascularization During ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Nov-Dec;58(3):260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Jul 21. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015. PMID: 26206110 Review.
Cited by
-
Complete infarct-related artery revascularization in acute myocardial infarction patients. CORAMI Registry.Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2015;11(2):84-8. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2015.52279. Epub 2015 Jun 19. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2015. PMID: 26161098 Free PMC article.
-
Management of Multivessel Coronary Disease in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Sep;17(9):632. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0632-6. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015. PMID: 26238745 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Culprit vessel only versus "one-week" staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.J Geriatr Cardiol. 2015 May;12(3):226-31. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.03.001. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 26089845 Free PMC article.
-
Value of gated-SPECT MPI for ischemia-guided PCI of non-culprit vessels in STEMI patients with multivessel disease after primary PCI.J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 Oct;25(5):1616-1620. doi: 10.1007/s12350-018-1368-7. Epub 2018 Aug 1. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30069820
-
Comprehensive Review of Complete Versus Culprit-only Revascularization for Multivessel Disease in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Heart Int. 2021 Aug 2;15(1):54-59. doi: 10.17925/HI.2021.15.1.54. eCollection 2021. Heart Int. 2021. PMID: 36277319 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous