Comparison of toxicity and outcomes of concurrent radiotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/etoposide in stage III non-small cell lung cancer
- PMID: 24403265
- PMCID: PMC3892396
- DOI: 10.1002/cam4.142
Comparison of toxicity and outcomes of concurrent radiotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/etoposide in stage III non-small cell lung cancer
Abstract
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has become the standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The comparative merits of two widely used regimens: carboplatin/paclitaxel (PC) and cisplatin/etoposide (PE), each with concurrent radiotherapy, remain largely undefined. Records for consecutive patients with stage III NSCLC treated with PC or PE and ≥60 Gy chest radiotherapy between 2000 and 2011 were reviewed for outcomes and toxicity. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox modeling with the Wald test. Comparison across groups was done using the student's t and chi-squared tests. Seventy-five (PC: 44, PE: 31) patients were analyzed. PC patients were older (median 71 vs. 63 years; P = 0.0006). Other characteristics were comparable between groups. With PE, there was significantly increased grade ≥3 neutropenia (39% vs. 14%, P = 0.024) and thrombocytopenia (10% vs. 0%, P = 0.039). Radiation pneumonitis was more common with PC (66% vs. 38%, P = 0.033). Five treatment-related deaths occurred (PC: 3 vs. PE: 2, P = 1.000). With a median follow-up of 51.6 months, there were no significant differences in relapse-free survival (median PC 12.0 vs. PE 11.5 months, P = 0.700) or overall survival (median PC 20.7 vs. PE 13.7 months; P = 0.989). In multivariate analyses, no factors predicted for improved survival for either regimen. PC was more likely to be used in elderly patients. Despite this, PC resulted in significantly less hematological toxicity but achieved similar survival outcomes as PE. PC is an acceptable CCRT regimen, especially in older patients with multiple comorbidities.
Keywords: Carboplatin/paclitaxel; cisplatin/etoposide; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; locally advanced; non-small cell lung cancer; stage III.
© 2013 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Etoposide and cisplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter randomized phase III trial.Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):777-783. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx009. Ann Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28137739 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized phase II study of concurrent cisplatin/etoposide or paclitaxel/carboplatin and thoracic radiotherapy in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer.Lung Cancer. 2012 Jul;77(1):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.02.011. Epub 2012 Mar 13. Lung Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22418243 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of adding concurrent chemotherapy to hyperfractionated radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): comparison of RTOG 83-11 and RTOG 91-06.Am J Clin Oncol. 1997 Oct;20(5):435-40. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199710000-00002. Am J Clin Oncol. 1997. PMID: 9345325 Clinical Trial.
-
Radiotherapy and chemotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: preclinical and early clinical data.Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2004 Feb;18(1):41-53. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8588(03)00138-2. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2004. PMID: 15005280 Review.
-
Platinum drugs in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.Br J Cancer. 2002 Oct 7;87(8):825-33. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600540. Br J Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12373594 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Elderly patients with stage III NSCLC survive longer when chemotherapy is added to radiotherapy-fortune favours the bold.Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018 Dec;7(Suppl 4):S388-S392. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.08.12. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018. PMID: 30705864 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Efficacy of platinum agents for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer following platinum-based chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study.BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 29;22(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09441-3. BMC Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35351059 Free PMC article.
-
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: recent progress and future perspectives (a narrative review).Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Apr;10(4):2018-2031. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-704. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021. PMID: 34012811 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Concomitant etoposide and cisplatin provided improved survival compared with docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(30):e4280. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004280. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. PMID: 27472701 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and dose-volume relationship of radiation pneumonitis after concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by durvalumab for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2020 May 30;23:85-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.05.006. eCollection 2020 Jul. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32529055 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ferlay J, Shin H-R, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int. J. Cancer. 2010;127:2893–2917. - PubMed
-
- Furuse K, Fukuoka M, Kawahara M, et al. Phase III study of concurrent versus sequential thoracic radiotherapy in combination with mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin in unresectable stage III non–small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999;17:2692–2699. - PubMed
-
- O'Rourke N, Roqué I Figuls M, Farré Bernadó N, Macbeth F. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010;16:CD002140. - PubMed
-
- Price A. Emerging developments of chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2012;9:591–598. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical