Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Apr;52(4):1028-33.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.03102-13. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

The value of postmortem microbiology cultures

Affiliations
Review

The value of postmortem microbiology cultures

Stefan Riedel. J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Since the inception of evidence-based scientific concepts in medicine in the 19th century, the utility of postmortem microbiologic examinations has been a topic of controversy. For every study describing a lack of correlation between antemortem clinical and laboratory findings and postmortem culture results, there is equal evidence from other studies that indicates at least some limited utility in select cases. While the contributions of autopsies and postmortem microbiologic examinations in the discovery of novel infectious microorganisms are generally appreciated by the medical and scientific societies, the problems of implementing routine procedures in daily autopsy practice clearly relate to the lack of consensus on their broader utility as well as to a lack of regulatory guidelines. This review provides an overview of the literature-based evidence regarding the utility of postmortem microbiologic examinations together with some practical aspects and guidelines for those confronted with the issue of whether to allow or discourage the use of bacteriologic cultures obtained during autopsies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hoyert DL, Xu J. 2012. Deaths: preliminary data for 2011. Natl. Vital Stat. Rep. 61:1–52 - PubMed
    1. Burton EC, Phillips RS, Covinsky KE, Sands LP, Goldman L, Dawson NV, Connors AF, Landefeld CS. 2004. The relation of autopsy rate to physicians' beliefs and recommendations regarding autopsy. Am. J. Med. 117:255–261. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.028 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lundberg GD. 1998. Low-tech autopsies in the era of high-tech medicine: continued value for quality assurance and patient safety. JAMA 280:1273–1274. 10.1001/jama.280.14.1273 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. 2003. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected errors over time. JAMA 289:2849–2856. 10.1001/jama.289.21.2849 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burton EC. 2002. The autopsy: a professional responsibility in assuring quality of care. Am. J. Med. Qual. 17:56–60. 10.1177/106286060201700203 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources