Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;21(3):391-8.
doi: 10.1128/CVI.00748-13. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

Performance of a redesigned HIV Selectest enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay optimized to minimize vaccine-induced seropositivity in HIV vaccine trial participants

Collaborators, Affiliations

Performance of a redesigned HIV Selectest enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay optimized to minimize vaccine-induced seropositivity in HIV vaccine trial participants

Oksana Penezina et al. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Vaccine-induced seropositivity (VISP) or seroreactivity (VISR), defined as the reaction of antibodies elicited by HIV vaccines with antigens used in HIV diagnostic immunoassays, can result in reactive assay results for vaccinated but uninfected individuals, with subsequent misclassification of their infection status. The eventual licensure of a vaccine will magnify this issue and calls for the development of mitigating solutions in advance. An immunoassay that discriminates between antibodies elicited by vaccine antigens and those elicited by infection has been developed to address this laboratory testing need. The HIV Selectest is based on consensus and clade-specific HIV peptides that are omitted in many HIV vaccine constructs. The assay was redesigned to enhance performance across worldwide clades and to simplify routine use via a standard kit format. The redesigned assay was evaluated with sera from vaccine trial participants, HIV-infected and uninfected individuals, and healthy controls. The HIV Selectest exhibited specificities of 99.5% with sera from uninfected recipients of 6 different HIV vaccines and 100% with sera from normal donors, while detecting HIV-1 infections, including intercurrent infections, with 95 to 100% sensitivity depending on the clade, with the highest sensitivities for clades A and C. HIV Selectest sensitivity decreased in very early seroconversion specimens, which possibly explains the slightly lower sensitivity observed for asymptomatic blood donors than for clinical HIV cases. Thus, the HIV Selectest provides a new laboratory tool for use in vaccine settings to distinguish the immune response to HIV vaccine antigens from that due to true infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
HIV Selectest assay configuration. A mixture of 5 biotinylated peptides is immobilized, via a streptavidin bridge, to the wells of a 96-well biotin-coated microplate. Serum antibodies are detected with a human IgG-specific horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate and a chromogenic substrate.
FIG 2
FIG 2
HIV Selectest signal/cutoff (S/CO) values for 671 HIV-1-infected individuals (A, ◊), 400 normal blood donors (B, □) and 1,183 uninfected HIV vaccine trial participants, including 778 vaccine recipients (C, △), 255 placebo recipients (D, ○), and 150 preimmune subjects (E, ☒). The cutoff value is indicated as a horizontal dashed line.
FIG 3
FIG 3
HIV Selectest signal/cutoff (S/CO) values versus infection recency in the clade C early-infection panel. The extremely early group (signal/cutoff values of <4) is to the left of the vertical line. The cutoff value is indicated by the horizontal dashed line.

References

    1. Haynes BF, Gilbert PB, McElrath MJ, Zolla-Pazner S, Tomaras GD, Alam SM, Evans DT, Montefiori DC, Karnasuta C, Sutthent R, Liao H-X, DeVico AL, Lewis GK, Williams C, Pinter A, Fong Y, Janes H, DeCamp A, Huang Y, Rao M, Billings E, Karasavvas N, Robb ML, Ngauy V, de Souza MS, Paris R, Ferrari G, Bailer RT, Soderberg KA, Andrews C, Berman PW, Frahm N, De Rosa SC, Alpert MD, Yates NL, Shen X, Koup RA, Pitisuttithum P, Kaewkungwal J, Nitayaphan S, Rerks-Ngarm S, Michael NL, Kim JH. 2012. Immune-correlates analysis of an HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 366:1275–1286. 10.1056/NEJMoa1113425 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barouch DH, Liu J, Li H, Maxfield LF, Abbink P, Lynch DM, Iampietro MJ, SanMiguel A, Seaman MS, Ferrari G, Forthal DN, Ourmanov I, Hirsch VM, Carville A, Mansfield KG, Stablein D, Pau MG, Schuitemaker H, Sadoff JC, Billings EA, Rao M, Robb ML, Kim JH, Marovich MA, Goudsmit J, Michael NL. 2012. Vaccine protection against acquisition of neutralization-resistant SIV challenges in rhesus monkeys. Nature 482:89–93. 10.1038/nature10766 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suthon V, Archawin R, Chanchai C, John L, Wichuda K, Wiroj P, Hansa T, Pathom S, Pongnuwat S, Silaporn P, Wimala I. 2002. Impact of HIV vaccination on laboratory diagnosis: case reports. BMC Infect. Dis. 2:19. 10.1186/1471-2334-2-19 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belshe RB, Clements ML, Keefer MC, Graham BS, Corey L, Sposto R, Wescott S, Lawrence D. 1994. Interpreting HIV serodiagnostic test results in the 1990s: social risks of HIV vaccine studies in uninfected volunteers. Ann. Intern. Med. 121:584–589 - PubMed
    1. Van Braeckel E, Koutsoukos M, Bourguignon P, Clement F, McNally L, Leroux-Roels G. 2011. Vaccine-induced HIV seropositivity: a problem on the rise. J. Clin. Virol. 50:334–347. 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.01.003 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources