Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;4(4):472-5.
doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.123045.

Evaluation of marginal leakage of different temporary restorative materials in Endodontics

Affiliations

Evaluation of marginal leakage of different temporary restorative materials in Endodontics

Pedro Henrique Duarte França De Castro et al. Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the coronal marginal leakage of three temporary restorative materials used for root canal sealing after endodontic treatment.

Materials and methods: A total of 88 single-rooted teeth were submitted to biomechanical preparation and filled by lateral condensation technique. After obturation process, the teeth were randomly separated into four groups, being two teeth of each group used as positive and negative control. Temporary sealing was performed as follows: GI - Clip F (VOCO); GII - Bioplic (Biodinβmica); GIII - Vitremer (3M ESPE) and GIV - Ketak N100 (3M ESPE). Next, the specimens were immersed into Indian ink for 30 and 60- days, being 10 specimens for each time interval and then submitted to diaphanization to verify the amount of coronal leakage using a measuring microscope.

Results: Leakage mean values within the 30-day period were as follows: Vitremer (0.3 mm), Ketak N100 and Clip F (0.6 mm) and Bioplic (1.7 mm). Within the 60-day period, leakage means were 1.1 mm, 1.5 mm, 2.2 mm and 2.6 mm, respectively.

Conclusions: None of the materials was capable of preventing marginal leakage within the 30- and 60-day period. In both time intervals, Bioplic presented the highest mean of leakage and Vitremer the lowest.

Keywords: Endodontics; marginal microleakage; temporary restoration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Linear coronal leakage measurement under optical microscope. (a) Test specimen from Vitremer group (lowest microleakage mean values). (b) Test specimen from negative control group (no dye penetration -arrow) (left) and test specimen from Bioplic group (right)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grecca FS, Garcia RB, Bramante CM, Moraes IG, Bernardineli N. A quantitative analysis of rotary, ultrasonic and manual techniques to treat proximally flattened root canals. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007;15:89–93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siqueira JF, Jr, Araújo MC, Garcia PF, Fraga RC, Dantas CJ. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals. J Endod. 1997;23:499–502. - PubMed
    1. Sasaki EW, Versiani MA, Perez DE, Sousa-Neto MD, Silva-Sousa YT, Silva RG. Ex vivo analysis of the debris remaining in flattened root canals of vital and nonvital teeth after biomechanical preparation with Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Braz Dent J. 2006;17:233–6. - PubMed
    1. Gonçalves LC, Sponchiado EC, Jr, Marques AA, Frota MF, Garcia Lda F. Morphometrical analysis of cleaning capacity of a hybrid instrumentation in mesial flattened root canals. Aust Endod J. 2010;36:1–6. - PubMed
    1. Sponchiado EC, Jr, Azevedo LK, Marchesan MA, Brugnera Júnior A, Alfredo E, Sousa Neto MD. Cervical microleakage in root canals treated with Er: YAG and Nd: YAG laser. Proc SPIE Lasers Dent. 2005;6:140–3.