Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;18(4):298-303.

The effect of intermittent local heat and cold on labor pain and child birth outcome

Affiliations

The effect of intermittent local heat and cold on labor pain and child birth outcome

Zhila Ganji et al. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Labor pain is one of the severest pains that cause many women request cesarean section for fear of pain. Thus, controlling labor pain is a major concern of maternity care. Nowadays, interest in non-pharmacological pain relief methods has been increased because of their lower side effects. The effects of discrete heat and cold on decreasing labor pain have been reported but there was no evaluation of the effects of simultaneous heat and cold. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of intermittent heat and cold on pain severity and childbirth outcomes.

Materials and methods: This study was a randomized controlled trial. Sixty-four nulliparous women with term, One fetus, and low-risk pregnancy were divided into the intervention (32 participants) and the control group (32 participants) by random allocation. Excluding criteria were: administration of pain relief drugs, skin disease in the field of intervention, fetal distress, bleeding, fever, and disagreement with participation in the study. Warm and cold packs were used intermittently on low back and lower abdomen during the first phase and on perineum during the second phase of labor. Pain intensity was assessed with Visual Analogue Scale. Descriptive statistic, chi square, and t-test were used for data analysis.

Results: There were no significant differences in demographic and midwifery characteristics and the baseline pain between two groups. The pain was significantly lower in intervention group during the first and second phases of labor. Duration of the first and third phases of labor was shorter in the case group. There were no significant differences in type of delivery, perineal laceration, oxytocin uptake, fetal heart rate, and APGAR between two groups.

Discussion: Local warming with intermittent cold pack can reduce labor pain without adverse effects on maternal and fetal outcomes. It is an inexpensive and simple method.

Conclusion: Intermittent local heat and cold therapy is a no pharmalogical, safe and effective method to relief labor pain.

Keywords: Child birth; cold temperature; hot temperature; labor pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The comparison of pain severity between groups during labor

References

    1. Waters L, Raisler J. Ice massage for reduction of labor pain. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2003;48:317–21. - PubMed
    1. Sercekus P, Okumus H. Fears associated with child birthing among nulliparous women in Turkey. Midwifery. 2007;25:155–62. - PubMed
    1. Dahlen HG, Homer CS, Cooke M, Upton AM, Nunn RA, Brodrick BS. Soothing the ring of fire: Australian women's and midwives experiences of using perineal warm packs in the second stage of labor. Midwifery. 2009;25:39–48. - PubMed
    1. Nerum H, Halvorsen L, Sorlie T, Oian P. Maternal request for caesarean section due to fear of birth: Can it be changed through crisis-oriented counseling? Birth. 2006;33:221–8. - PubMed
    1. Kolas T, Hofoss D, Daltveirt AK, Nilsen ST, Henriksen T, Häger R, et al. Indications for caesarean deliveries in Norway. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:864–70. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources