Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;5(1):98-106.
doi: 10.4300/JGME-05-01-33.

Educational milestone development in the first 7 specialties to enter the next accreditation system

Educational milestone development in the first 7 specialties to enter the next accreditation system

Susan R Swing et al. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Outcome Project introduced 6 general competencies relevant to medical practice but fell short of its goal to create a robust assessment system that would allow program accreditation based on outcomes. In response, the ACGME, the specialty boards, and other stakeholders collaborated to develop educational milestones, observable steps in residents' professional development that describe progress from entry to graduation and beyond.

Objectives: We summarize the development of the milestones, focusing on 7 specialties, moving to the next accreditation system in July 2013, and offer evidence of their validity.

Methods: Specialty workgroups with broad representation used a 5-level developmental framework and incorporated information from literature reviews, specialty curricula, dialogue with constituents, and pilot testing.

Results: The workgroups produced richly diverse sets of milestones that reflect the community's consideration of attributes of competence relevant to practice in the given specialty. Both their development process and the milestones themselves establish a validity argument, when contemporary views of validity for complex performance assessment are used.

Conclusions: Initial evidence for validity emerges from the development processes and the resulting milestones. Further advancing a validity argument will require research on the use of milestone data in resident assessment and program accreditation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE
FIGURE
Example of Milestones in the ACGME Template With Milestone Nomenclature

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn TC. The next accreditation system-rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1051–1056. - PubMed
    1. Nasca T. The next step in the outcomes-based accreditation project. ACGME Bull. 2008:2–4.
    1. Swing SR. The ACGME Outcome Project: retrospective and prospective. Med Teach. 2007;29:648–654. - PubMed
    1. Varney A, Todd C, Hingle S, Clark M. Description of a developmental criterion-referenced assessment for promoting competence in internal medicine residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2009;1(1):73–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meade LB, Borden SH, McArdle P, et al. From theory to actual practice: creation and application of milestones in an internal medicine residency program, 2004–2010. Med Teach. 2012;34(9):717–723. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources