Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;5(1):130-7.
doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00130.1.

Operationalizing the internal medicine milestones-an early status report

Operationalizing the internal medicine milestones-an early status report

Christopher Nabors et al. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The internal medicine milestones were developed to advance outcomes-based residency training and will play an important role in the next accreditation system.

Innovation: As an element of our program's participation in the internal medicine educational innovations project, we implemented a milestones-based evaluation process in our general medicine and pulmonary-critical care rotations on July 1, 2010.

Measures: Outcomes assessed included survey-rated acceptability to participating faculty, residents, and clinical competency committee members.

Results: Faculty and residents agreed that the milestones promoted a common understanding of what knowledge, skills, and attitudes should be displayed at particular points in residents' professional development and enhanced evaluators' ability to provide specific performance feedback. Most residents and faculty members agreed that the milestones promoted fairness and uniformity in the evaluation process. Clinical competency committee members agreed the milestones improved the quality of information available for deliberations and resulted in more uniform promotion standards. Faculty rated the use of too many milestones per form/tool at a mean of 7.3 (where 1 was minimally problematic, and 10 was maximally problematic) and the potential for evaluator fatigue (mean, 8.2) as the most significant challenges to the use of milestones. Eight of 12 faculty members would recommend milestones in other programs; 4 were uncertain.

Conclusions: Despite logistical challenges, educators and trainees found that milestones promoted a common understanding of what knowledge, skills and attitudes should be displayed at particular stages of training; permitted greater specificity in performance feedback; and enhanced uniformity and fairness in promotion decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Green ML, Aagaard EM, Caverzagie KJ, Chick DA, Holmboe E, Kane G, Smith CD, et al. Charting the road to competence: developmental milestones for IM residency training. J Grad Med Educ. 2009;1(1):5–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn TC. The next GME accreditation system–rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):1051–1056. - PubMed
    1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Educational Innovation Project. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/140.... Accessed January 7, 2013.
    1. Ten Cate O. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Med Educ. 2005;39(12):1176–1177. - PubMed
    1. Huddle TS, Heudebert GR. Taking apart the art: the risk of anatomizing clinical competence. Acad Med. 2007;82(6):536–541. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources