Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Jun;5(2):203-10.
doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00238.1.

Update in internal medicine residency education: a review of the literature in 2010 and 2011

John E Eaton, Darcy A Reed, Brian M Aboff, Stephanie A Call, Paul R Chelminski, Uma Thanarajasingam, Jason A Post, Kris G Thomas, Denise M Dupras, Thomas J Beckman, Colin P West, Christopher M Wittich, Andrew J Halvorsen, Furman S McDonald
Review

Update in internal medicine residency education: a review of the literature in 2010 and 2011

John E Eaton et al. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based practice in education requires high-quality evidence, and many in the medical education community have called for an improvement in the methodological quality of education research.

Objective: Our aim was to use a valid measure of medical education research quality to highlight the methodological quality of research publications and provide an overview of the recent internal medicine (IM) residency literature.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE and PreMEDLINE to identify English-language articles published in the United States and Canada between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011, focusing on IM residency education. Study quality was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI), which has demonstrated reliability and validity. Qualitative articles were excluded. Articles were ranked by quality score, and the top 25% were examined for common themes, and 2 articles within each theme were selected for in-depth presentation.

Results: The search identified 731 abstracts of which 223 articles met our inclusion criteria. The mean (±SD) MERSQI score of the 223 studies included in the review was 11.07 (±2.48). Quality scores were highest for data analysis (2.70) and lowest for study design (1.41) and validity (1.29). The themes identified included resident well-being, duty hours and resident workload, career decisions and gender, simulation medicine, and patient-centered outcomes.

Conclusions: Our review provides an overview of the IM medical education literature for 2010-2011, highlighting 5 themes of interest to the medical education community. Study design and validity are 2 areas where improvements in methodological quality are needed, and authors should consider these when designing research protocols.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Summary of Search and Article Selection
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mean Scores for the 6 Methodological Domains Among 223 Articles Published 2010–2011
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dauphinee WD, Wood-Dauphinee S. The need for evidence in medical education: the development of best evidence medical education as an opportunity to inform, guide, and sustain medical education research. Acad Med. 2004;79(10):925–930. - PubMed
    1. Wartman SA. Research in medical education: the challenge for the next decade. Acad Med. 1994;69(8):608–614. - PubMed
    1. Lurie SJ. Raising the passing grade for studies of medical education. JAMA. 2003;290(9):1210–1212. - PubMed
    1. Chen FM, Bauchner H, Burstin H. A call for outcomes research in medical education. Acad Med. 2004;79(10):955–960. - PubMed
    1. Whitcomb ME. Using clinical outcomes data to reform medical education. Acad Med. 2005;80(2):117. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources