Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;5(2):299-302.
doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00159.1.

The writing retreat: a high-yield clinical faculty development opportunity in academic writing

The writing retreat: a high-yield clinical faculty development opportunity in academic writing

Christian T Cable et al. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The need for consistent academic productivity challenges junior clinician-scholars, who often lack the aptitude to ensure efficient production of manuscripts.

Intervention: To solve this problem, an academic division of a major medical center developed an off-site writing retreat. The purpose of the retreat was not to teach writing skills, but to offer senior mentor assistance with a focus on the elements of manuscript writing.

Methods: The retreat paired senior faculty members with junior staff. Senior faculty identified manuscript topics and provided real-time writing and editing supervision. Team-building exercises, midcourse corrections, and debriefing interviews were built into the retreat. The number of manuscripts and grant proposals generated during the 2008-2011 retreats was recorded, and the program was evaluated by using unstructured debriefing interviews.

Results: An average of 6 to 7 faculty members and fellows participated in each retreat. During the past 4 years, participants produced an average of 3 grant proposals and 7 manuscripts per retreat. After the writing retreat, each fellow and junior faculty member produced an average of 4 scholarly products per year, compared to fewer than 2 for prior years' retreats. Participant feedback indicated the success of the retreat resulted from protected time, direct mentorship by the scholars involved, and pairing of authors, which allows for rapid production of manuscripts and accelerated the editing process. More than 80% of mentors returned each year to participate.

Conclusions: The writing retreat is a feasible, effective strategy to increase scholarship among faculty, acceptable to mentees and mentors, and sustainable over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ruiz JG, Candler CS, Qadri SS, Roos BA. E-learning as evidence of educational scholarship: a survey of chairs of promotion and tenure committees at U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 2009;84:47–57. - PubMed
    1. Geraci SA, Hollander H, Babbott SF, Buranosky R, Devine DR, Kovach RA, et al. AAIM report on master teachers and clinician educators, part 4: faculty role and scholarship. Am J Med. 2010;123:1065–1069. - PubMed
    1. Boyer E. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1990.
    1. Shulman L. The scholarship of teaching. Change. 1999;31(5):11.
    1. Chapman AB, Guay-Woodford LM. Nurturing passion in a time of academic climate change: the modern-day challenge of junior faculty development. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:1878–1883. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources