Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep;5(3):498-502.
doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00215.1.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Internal Medicine: A National Survey of Educational Leadership

Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Internal Medicine: A National Survey of Educational Leadership

Daniel J Schnobrich et al. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Sep.

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Dec;11(6):742. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00725.1. J Grad Med Educ. 2019. PMID: 31871585 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound is a valuable tool in the safe performance of an increasing number of procedures. It has additionally emerged as a powerful instrument for point-of-care assessment by offering internists an opportunity to extend their traditional physical examination.

Objective: This study explored how internal medicine (IM) educators perceive the use of ultrasound for procedures and point-of-care assessments, the extent to which curricula for teaching IM residents ultrasound skills exist, and perceived barriers to teaching its use.

Methods: In February 2012, we administered a 27-question survey to all members of the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine, eliciting their opinions about the use of point-of-care ultrasound.

Results: Of 2200 surveys distributed electronically, 234 were returned (a 11% response rate), including 167 by program directors or assistant program directors. Respondents highly rated the usefulness of ultrasound for central-line placement, thoracentesis, paracentesis, and diagnosis of pleural effusions. Evaluation of vena cava and heart, and placement of radial artery catheters received somewhat lower usefulness scores. Forty-five respondents (25%) reported having formal curricula to teach point-of-care ultrasound, and 46 respondents without current ultrasound programs were planning to initiate them in the next 12 months. Potential barriers to teaching and use of ultrasound included the time and cost to train faculty, the cost of ultrasound machines, and the time required to train residents.

Conclusions: Educational leaders in IM view point-of-care ultrasound as a valuable tool in diagnosis and procedures, and many residency programs are teaching these skills to their learners.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Perceived Usefulness of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Performed by Internists The graph depicts average usefulness scores (based on a 5-point Likert scale in which 1  =  not at all useful and 5  =  very useful) for survey respondents. The number of responses ranged from 231 to 234 for each item. Abbreviations: IVC, inferior vena cava; FAST, Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma; DVT, deep venous thrombosis.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Current Usage of Point-of-Care Ultrasound by Internal Medicine Residents The graph depicts the proportion of survey respondents who indicated that residents in their setting currently use ultrasound for a particular application (n  =  161 for all questions). Procedural uses of ultrasound are the most common, with a substantially smaller fraction of residents using point-of-care ultrasound for diagnostic applications. Programs were asked the indication(s) for which residents perform bedside ultrasound; data is the percentage of programs reporting use for the given indication. Abbreviations: IVC, inferior vena cava; FAST, Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma; DVT, deep venous thrombosis.

References

    1. Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S, Beverley C, et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;327(7411):361. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7411.361. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, Markowitz AJ. Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) (43):i–x, 1–668. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shiloh AL, Savel RH, Paulin LM, Eisen LA. Ultrasound-guided catheterization of the radial artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Chest. 2011;139(3):524–529. doi:10.1378/chest.10-0919. - PubMed
    1. Nazeer SR, Dewbre H, Miller AH. Ultrasound-assisted paracentesis performed by emergency physicians vs the traditional technique: a prospective, randomized study. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23(3):363–367. - PubMed
    1. Patel PA, Ernst FR, Gunnarsson CL. Evaluation of hospital complications and costs associated with using ultrasound guidance during abdominal paracentesis procedures. J Med Econ. 2012;15(1):1–7. doi:10.3111/13696998.2011.628723. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources