Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan 8;6(1):289-303.
doi: 10.3390/nu6010289.

Greenhouse gas emissions and the Australian diet--comparing dietary recommendations with average intakes

Gilly A Hendrie  1 , Brad G Ridoutt  2 , Thomas O Wiedmann  3 , Manny Noakes  4
Affiliations

Greenhouse gas emissions and the Australian diet--comparing dietary recommendations with average intakes

Gilly A Hendrie et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Nutrition guidelines now consider the environmental impact of food choices as well as maintaining health. In Australia there is insufficient data quantifying the environmental impact of diets, limiting our ability to make evidence-based recommendations. This paper used an environmentally extended input-output model of the economy to estimate greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe) for different food sectors. These data were augmented with food intake estimates from the 1995 Australian National Nutrition Survey. The GHGe of the average Australian diet was 14.5 kg carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) per person per day. The recommended dietary patterns in the Australian Dietary Guidelines are nutrient rich and have the lowest GHGe (~25% lower than the average diet). Food groups that made the greatest contribution to diet-related GHGe were red meat (8.0 kg CO2e per person per day) and energy-dense, nutrient poor "non-core" foods (3.9 kg CO2e). Non-core foods accounted for 27% of the diet-related emissions. A reduction in non-core foods and consuming the recommended serves of core foods are strategies which may achieve benefits for population health and the environment. These data will enable comparisons between changes in dietary intake and GHGe over time, and provide a reference point for diets which meet population nutrient requirements and have the lowest GHGe.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Greenhouse Gas Emissions in kilograms carbon dioxide equivalents (kg CO2e) per person per day for the diet scenarios.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Tukker A., Goldbohm R.A., de Koning A., Verheijden M., Kleijn R., Wolf O., Perez-Dominguez I., Rueda-Cantuche J.M. Environmental impacts of changes to healthier diets in Europe. Ecol. Econ. 2011;70:1776–1788. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.001. - DOI
    1. Weber C.L., Matthews H.S. Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Eviron. Sci. Technol. 2008;42:3508–3513. doi: 10.1021/es702969f. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garnett T. Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: Impacts and options for policy makers. Environ. Sci. Policy. 2009;12:491–503. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.006. - DOI
    1. Berners-Lee M., Hoolohan C., Cammack H., Hewitt C.N. The relative greenhousegas impacts of realistic dietary choices. Energy Policy. 2012;43:184–190. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.054. - DOI
    1. Wolf O., Perez-Dominguez I., Rueda-Cantuche J.M., Tukker A., Kleign R., de Koning A., Bausch-Goldbohm S., Verheijden M. Do healthy diets in Europe matter to the environment? A quantitative analysis. J. Policy Model. 2011;33:8–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.10.009. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources