Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1983 Aug;9(8):1247-53.
doi: 10.1007/BF00982226.

Quantitation of a bioactive metabolite in undisturbed rhizosphere-Benzyl isothiocyanate fromCarica papaya L

Affiliations

Quantitation of a bioactive metabolite in undisturbed rhizosphere-Benzyl isothiocyanate fromCarica papaya L

C S Tang et al. J Chem Ecol. 1983 Aug.

Abstract

A "continuous root exudate trapping system" was recently developed in this laboratory by which the allelopathic metabolites from the undisturbed rhizosphere ofHemarthria altissima (Poir.) Stapf. et Hubb. were collected. Twelve phenolic compounds were identified by capillary GC-MS (Tang and Young, 1982). In this report, we further describe its use for the quantitation of benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC), a highly bioactive volatile compound, in the rhizosphere of growing papaya plants. Samples were collected from 64 individual papaya (Carica papaya L.) trees of Waimanalo and Higgins cultivars. Hydrophobie compounds collected on XAD-4 columns were eluted with acetone and the levels of BITC were determined by a gas Chromatograph equipped with a sulfur-specific flame photometric detector. For 2-month-old trees, the rate of BITC released from the root system of Waimanalo was 2.03 ± 0.85μg/tree/day. From Higgins, it was 2.36 ± 1.06 μg/tree/day. It has been reported that Waimanalo is resistant whereas Higgins is susceptible toPhytophthora palmivora Butl., the major root rot fungal pathogen of papaya trees in Hawaii. Our results lead us to conclude that the rate of BITC released alone cannot account for differences in the resistance of these two cultivars to the pathogen.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Plant Physiol. 1974 Apr;53(4):585-8 - PubMed
    1. J Chromatogr. 1974 Nov 6;99(0):745-62 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1982 Jan;69(1):155-60 - PubMed
    1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Dec 8;452(2):510-20 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1971 Feb 26;171(3973):757-70 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources