Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;119(9):651-7.
doi: 10.1007/s11547-013-0375-7. Epub 2014 Jan 10.

Role of CT in the diagnosis of jejunal-ileal perforations

Affiliations

Role of CT in the diagnosis of jejunal-ileal perforations

Marirosa Cristallo Lacalamita et al. Radiol Med. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the computed tomography (CT) signs of free and covered small-bowel perforations and the potential of CT in recognising the aetiology.

Materials and methods: Thirty-five patients with surgically proven small-bowel perforation were retrospectively evaluated. Fundamental signs (extraluminal air, solution of continuity) and secondary signs (thickening of the mesentery, free or perilesional fluid, wall thickening) were considered.

Results: CT alterations were found in 31/35 (88.6%) patients: extraluminal air (30/35, 85.7%), solution of continuity (11/35, 31.4%), intra-abdominal fluid (27/35, 77.1%), thickening of the mesentery (20/35, 57.1%), and wall thickening (14/35, 40%). In 25/35 cases (71.4%) pneumoperitoneum was detected, associated with secondary signs (23/25, 82%), confirmed as free perforations at surgery. In 5/35 patients (14.2%), peri-intestinal air bubbles and secondary signs were evident, while in 1/35 cases (2.8%) only secondary signs were seen, namely covered perforations. In 4/35 patients (11.4%) with a covered perforation, the CT scan was negative. The nature of the perforations was completely recognisable in 26/31 cases (83.9%), partially identifiable in 4/31 (12.9%), not evident in 1/31 (3.2%).

Conclusion: CT investigation is essential in the recognition of a small-bowel perforation and in the definition of its nature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur Radiol. 2004 Oct;14(10):1918-25 - PubMed
    1. Radiol Med. 2012 Aug;117(5):749-58 - PubMed
    1. Radiol Clin North Am. 1994 Sep;32(5):829-44 - PubMed
    1. Clin Imaging. 2004 Sep-Oct;28(5):334-9 - PubMed
    1. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1983 Oct;7(5):825-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources