Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan 7;9(1):e85435.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085435. eCollection 2014.

Deducing hybrid performance from parental metabolic profiles of young primary roots of maize by using a multivariate diallel approach

Affiliations

Deducing hybrid performance from parental metabolic profiles of young primary roots of maize by using a multivariate diallel approach

Kristen Feher et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Heterosis, the greater vigor of hybrids compared to their parents, has been exploited in maize breeding for more than 100 years to produce ever better performing elite hybrids of increased yield. Despite extensive research, the underlying mechanisms shaping the extent of heterosis are not well understood, rendering the process of selecting an optimal set of parental lines tedious. This study is based on a dataset consisting of 112 metabolite levels in young roots of four parental maize inbred lines and their corresponding twelve hybrids, along with the roots' biomass as a heterotic trait. Because the parental biomass is a poor predictor for hybrid biomass, we established a model framework to deduce the biomass of the hybrid from metabolite profiles of its parental lines. In the proposed framework, the hybrid metabolite levels are expressed relative to the parental levels by incorporating the standard concept of additivity/dominance, which we name the Combined Relative Level (CRL). Our modeling strategy includes a feature selection step on the parental levels which are demonstrated to be predictive of CRL across many hybrid metabolites. We demonstrate that these selected parental metabolites are further predictive of hybrid biomass. Our approach directly employs the diallel structure in a multivariate fashion, whereby we attempt to not only predict macroscopic phenotype (biomass), but also molecular phenotype (metabolite profiles). Therefore, our study provides the first steps for further investigations of the genetic determinants to metabolism and, ultimately, growth. Finally, our success on the small-scale experiments implies a valid strategy for large-scale experiments, where parental metabolite profiles may be used together with profiles of selected hybrids as a training set to predict biomass of all possible hybrids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Hybrid class label matrix.
The hybrid class label matrix is established using moderated t-statistics (cf. Methods). It shows the observed metabolite heterosis mode of action in all hybrids. Metabolites with unbalanced class labels (e.g. predominantly showing similar class, upper 53 rows) were excluded before conducting classification methods. Various classification methods were used on parental metabolite data to investigate which parental metabolites allow to predict the observed classes within hybrids.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Ranking of the parental features.
Parental metabolite levels (224 features in total) are used to predict the observed class labels of 54 hybrid metabolites. In each prediction model all features can be ranked according to their weights. The ranks are scaled between 0 and 1 by dividing by the total feature number. The scaled median rank distribution of a feature, i.e. the individual boxes in the plot, then gives an estimate regarding the importance of the absolute parental level of the respective metabolite on the heterosis pattern of all hybrid metabolites.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Prediction evaluation.
The correlation between observed and predicted HP in models incorporating 5 metabolites. The metabolites have been selected based on a previous ranking (cf. Figure 2). It can be seen that good prediction accuracies are only obtained for high ranked metabolites and not for low ranked metabolites, which perform comparable to permuted data sets. Metabolite input matrices Xpp were established as described in Methods.

References

    1. Duvick DN (2005) Genetic Progress In Yield Of United States Maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica 50: 193–202.
    1. Shull G (1914) Duplicate Genes for Capsule Form in Bursa bursa-pastoris. Z Indukt Abstamm Vererbungsl 12: 97–149.
    1. Zanoni U, Dudley JW (1989) Comparison of different methods of identifying inbreds useful for improving elite maize hybrids. Crop Sci 29: 577–582.
    1. Melchinger AE (1999) Genetic diversity and heterosis. In:Cors JG and Pandey S (eds) The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 99–118.
    1. McWilliam JR, Griffing B (1965) Temperature-dependent heterosis in maize. Austral J Biol Sci 18: 569–583.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources