Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;5(6):777-82.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.09.09.

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a clinical comparative study

Affiliations

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a clinical comparative study

Kai-Yan Yu et al. J Thorac Dis. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Methods: In this retrospective evaluation, we included 64 patients with ARDS following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between January 2009 and December 2011. The primary evaluations were 28-day fatality and actual fatality. The secondary evaluations were sex, age, onset time, pH value, PaO2/FiO2, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE-II) score, and presence or absence after surgery of major surgery-related complications such as cardiac arrest, anastomotic fistula, and acute renal dysfunction.

Results: NPPV applied as the first-line intervention for ARDS following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer avoided intubation in 30 patients (30/64, 48.4%). There were no significant differences in gender, age, PaO2/FiO2, SOFA score, or APACHE-II score between the NPPV group and the patients who required invasive positive pressure ventilation (IPPV group) (P>0.05) at the time of onset, while differences in the PaO2/FiO2 (P<0.05) after 24 h of NPPV and presence of major surgery-related complications were highly significant (P<0.01).

Conclusions: NPPV may be an effective option for the treatment of ARDS/acute lung injury (ALI) following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. However, conversion to invasive mechanical ventilation should be considered in patients with severe postoperative complications such as acute renal dysfunction and cardiac arrest and in those with PaO2/FiO2 <180 after 2 h of NPPV.

Keywords: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV); acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); esophagectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patients selection. ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; NPPV, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation; IPPV, invasive positive pressure ventilation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PaO2/FiO2 at onset, 2 h and 24 h after NPPV treatment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhang Z.Protective ventilation for patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA 2013;309:654. - PubMed
    1. Wang W, Zhou Y, Su Z, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in one patient with gout complicated by severe pulmonary tuberculosis: report of one case and literature review. J Thorac Dis 2013;5:E50-2 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soma K.Acute respiratory distress syndrome and pneumonia. Masui 2013;62:547-56 - PubMed
    1. Solsona Durán JF, Basas Satorras M, Zapatero Ferrándiz A, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome criteria. Med Intensiva 2013;37:124. - PubMed
    1. Sigurdsson MI, Sigvaldason K, Gunnarsson TS, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: nationwide changes in incidence, treatment and mortality over 23 years. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013;57:37-45 - PubMed