Transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy: initial clinical experience
- PMID: 24412229
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.020
Transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy: initial clinical experience
Abstract
Background: Despite significant developments in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), simple prostatectomy remains an excellent option for patients with large glands.
Objective: To describe our technique of transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy (RSP).
Design, setting, and participants: From May 2011 to April 2013, 25 patients underwent RSP.
Surgical procedure: We performed RSP using our technique.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Baseline demographics, pathology data, perioperative complications, 90-d complications, and functional outcomes were assessed.
Results and limitations: Mean patient age was 72.9 yr (range: 54-88), baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was 23.9 (range: 9-35), prostate volume was 149.6 ml (range: 91-260), postvoid residual (PVR) was 208.1 ml (range: 72-800), maximum flow rate (Qmax) was 11.3 ml/s, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen was 9.4 ng/ml (range: 1.9-56.3). Eight patients were catheter dependent before surgery. Mean operative time was 214 min (range: 165-345), estimated blood loss was 143 ml (range: 50-350), and the hospital stay was 4 d (range: 2-8). There were no intraoperative complications and no conversions to open surgery. Five patients had a concomitant robotic procedure performed. Early functional outcomes demonstrated significant improvement from baseline with an 85% reduction in mean IPSS (p<0.0001), an 82.2% reduction in mean PVR (p=0.014), and a 77% increase in mean Qmax (p=0.20). This study is limited by small sample size and short follow-up period. One patient had a urinary tract infection; two had recurrent hematuria, one requiring transfusion; one patient had clot retention and extravasation, requiring reoperation.
Conclusions: Our technique of RSP is safe and effective. Good functional outcomes suggest it is a viable option for BPH and larger glands and can be used for patients requiring concomitant procedures.
Patient summary: We describe the technique and report the initial results of a series of cases of transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy. The procedure is both feasible and safe and a good option for benign prostatic hyperplasia with larger glands.
Keywords: Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Robotic surgery; Simple prostatectomy.
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic enlargement: surgical technique and outcomes in a high-volume robotic centre.Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):451-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Apr 14. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25887786
-
Bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate vs open prostatectomy in large benign prostatic hyperplasia cases - a medium term, prospective, randomized comparison.BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):793-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11730.x. Epub 2013 Mar 7. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 23469933 Clinical Trial.
-
Robotic single port suprapubic transvesical enucleation of the prostate (R-STEP): initial experience.BJU Int. 2012 Sep;110(5):732-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10954.x. Epub 2012 Feb 17. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22340135
-
Prostatectomy for benign prostate disease: open, laparoscopic and robotic techniques.Can J Urol. 2015 Oct;22 Suppl 1:60-6. Can J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26497345 Review.
-
Long-term results of open transvesical prostatectomy from a contemporary series of patients.Urology. 2004 Aug;64(2):306-10. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.033. Urology. 2004. PMID: 15302484 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Robot-Assisted Versus Open Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Jul 12;19(9):71. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0820-1. Curr Urol Rep. 2018. PMID: 29998354 Review.
-
Robotic Freyer's prostatectomy: Operative technique and single-center experience.Indian J Urol. 2021 Jul-Sep;37(3):247-253. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_78_21. Epub 2021 Jul 1. Indian J Urol. 2021. PMID: 34465954 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic simple prostatectomy vs HOLEP, a 'multi single-center' experiences comparison.Cent European J Urol. 2023;76(2):128-134. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.204. Epub 2023 Apr 17. Cent European J Urol. 2023. PMID: 37483855 Free PMC article.
-
Urethra-Sparing Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Postoperative Antegrade Ejaculation.J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 24;12(14):4867. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144867. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37510981 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic assisted laparoscopic simple suprapubic prostatectomy - The Smith Institute for Urology experience with an evolving technique.Asian J Urol. 2014 Oct;1(1):55-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 16. Asian J Urol. 2014. PMID: 29511638 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous